2021
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.692953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of the Real Hub Gene and Construction of a Novel Prognostic Signature for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Based on the Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator Algorithms

Abstract: Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) has a considerably bad prognosis, and its pathophysiologic mechanism remains unclear. Thus, we aimed to identify real hub genes to better explore the pathophysiology of PAAD and construct a prognostic panel to better predict the prognosis of PAAD using the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithms.Methods: WGCNA identified the modules most closely related to the PAAD stage and grad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, patients in the high-risk groups had worse outcome in the training and validation cohorts. The 3-years survival AUC value was 0.785 in the TCGA cohort, 0.818 in the ICGC cohort, 0.821 in the GSE28735, and 0.822 in the GSE62452, validating the model's excellent accuracy compared to other prognostic models reported in the literature (AUC = 0.698, (Ma et al, 2021); AUC = 0.657 (Yuan et al, 2021)). After univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted, the risk score was identified as an independent prognosis factor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Moreover, patients in the high-risk groups had worse outcome in the training and validation cohorts. The 3-years survival AUC value was 0.785 in the TCGA cohort, 0.818 in the ICGC cohort, 0.821 in the GSE28735, and 0.822 in the GSE62452, validating the model's excellent accuracy compared to other prognostic models reported in the literature (AUC = 0.698, (Ma et al, 2021); AUC = 0.657 (Yuan et al, 2021)). After univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted, the risk score was identified as an independent prognosis factor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…These genes were deemed as potential therapeutic targets for personalized treatment in tumor patients. Recently, along with the sequencing technology was rapidly developed, high-throughput genomics has been used for the exploration of tumor generation and progression-related genes ( 43 , 44 ). Moreover, the deep investigation of the molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis and development can be implemented by high-throughput genomics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognostic significance of differentially expressed ECMGs was examined utilizing univariate Cox regression analysis as well as Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) platform was applied to evaluate the significant association of the above genes with tumor stage ( 15 , 16 ). Generally speaking, the differentially expressed genes considerably linked to tumor prognosis and stage were often regarded as the hub genes of the onset and progression of tumors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%