Identification of the relationships among the indicators of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems in agricultural startups

Aliabadi, Vahid; Ataei, Pouria; Gholamrezai, Saeed

doi:10.1016/j.jik.2022.100245

Cited by 20 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results also confirm that SE is becoming increasingly important (Kraus et al, 2018;Diepolder et al, 2021;Aliabadi et al, 2022). Moreover, it was found that the value of the SE indicators in the 5CEECs show an additive trend, which should be assessed positively.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 71%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Sustainable entrepreneurship and its determinants. The case of selected Central Eastern European Countries: From the global financial crisis to the COVID-19 pandemic

Matera,

Misztal,

Kowalska

2023

Ekonomista

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zrównoważona przedsiębiorczość (SE) należy do złożonych i aktualnych problemów badawczych. Celem artykułu była ocena wpływu wybranych determinant na SE w pięciu krajach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej (Bułgarii, Chorwacji, Polsce, Rumunii i na Węgrzech) w latach 2008– 2021. Wzięto pod uwagę następujące czynniki: stabilizację makroekonomiczną, dostęp do źródeł finansowania, kreowanie wiedzy, zdolności przedsiębiorcze, regulacje prawne oraz indeks środowiskowy. Wkład do stanu badań polegał na stworzeniu oryginalnego wskaźnika SE i oceny czynników zewnętrznych wpływających na przedsiębiorczość w badanych krajach. Wykorzystane w badaniu współczynniki korelacji, metoda najmniejszych kwadratów oraz model wektorowo-autoregresyjny potwierdziły, że czynniki zewnętrzne znacząco wpływają na SE. Co więcej, modele pokazują różną siłę i kierunek zależności pomiędzy zmiennymi objaśnianymi i objaśniającymi. Wyniki badań potwierdzają konieczność koordynacji polityki rozwoju przedsiębiorczości z polityką makroekonomiczną, finansową i ochrony środowiska. Niezbędne jest również stosowanie skutecznych narzędzi wsparcia gospodarczego oraz większej presji ze strony UE na kraje emitujące szkodliwe substancje.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 71%

“…The authors choose the following variables: economic value, ecological value, social value, innovation, business, and decision-making spirit. Aliabadi et al (2022) created an SE indicator based on the summative content analysis. They weighed the criteria and sub-criteria using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.…”

Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable entrepreneurship and its determinants. The case of selected Central Eastern European Countries: From the global financial crisis to the COVID-19 pandemic

Matera,

Misztal,

Kowalska

2023

Ekonomista

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Building on this work, other studies have highlighted that improving the entrepreneurial ecosystem requires addressing the weakest elements or 'bottlenecks' (Aliabadi, Ataei & Gholamrezai, 2022;Szerb et al, 2022), but in some cases stronger elements can also compensate for weaker ones (Godley, Morawetz & Soga, 2021). This is rooted in the complex nature of ecosystems (Leendertse, Schrijvers & Stam, 2021;Stephens et al, 2022) and their potentially chaotic evolution (Cloutier & Messeghem, 2022).…”

Section: Interdependencies Within Entrepreneurial Ecosystemsmentioning

confidence: 86%

Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Mechanisms

Wurth¹,

Stam²,

Spigel³

2023

FNT in Entrepreneurship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Entrepreneurial ecosystems have developed from a powerful idea and concept into a transdisciplinary research program, increasing our understanding into entrepreneurship-led development and providing actionable knowledge for improving the conditions for entrepreneurship and development. In this paper we take stock of the progress to date and synthesize the findings of 181 empirical scientific entrepreneurial ecosystem studies with a systematic literature review. We organized the review around five key mechanisms that explain the nature and development of entrepreneurial ecosystems: (1) interdependence of its elements, (2) upward causation explaining entrepreneurial ecosystem outputs and (3) outcomes, (4) downward causation and path dependence, and (5) inter-ecosystem links. We summarize the findings and outline opportunities for research and discuss policy implications in the light of a transdisciplinary entrepreneurial ecosystem research program. This paper is of interest for scholars of all academic disciplines that provide knowledge that is relevant for the understanding of entrepreneurial ecosystems, entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship-led development, but also for all stakeholders involved in the development of entrepreneurial ecosystems.

show abstract

“…The data collection incorporated multiple data sources, starting with secondary sources and then collecting primary data through interviews with key informants, mainly start-up founders and key stakeholders, a technique previously used in studies of critical players in entrepreneurial ecosystems [44,45]. Based on the argument that "a sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystem focuses on sustainable development and how entrepreneurs can work to achieve innovative, risky, and profitable entrepreneurial activity" [46], 20 Qatari start-up founders were selected for interviews from different strategic technology sectors and 17 additional interviews were conducted with key informants with relevant experience in the entrepreneurial ecosystem.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward a Sustainable Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Qatar

Villegas-Mateos

2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to contribute to the empirical literature on sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems by understanding the opportunities and constraints to support its development using the case of Qatar. This study was designed using a triangulation method to combine different data collection techniques to increase the validity and reliability of the results. The data collection incorporated multiple data sources, starting with secondary sources and then collecting primary data through 37 interviews with key informants, mainly start-up founders and key stakeholders, a technique previously used in studies of critical players in entrepreneurial ecosystems. The findings were four-fold: (1) entrepreneurial ecosystem conditions are essential as facilitators of entrepreneurship, innovation, and sustainability, but government intervention can inhibit the outputs if the policies are not designed as customer-centric, (2) business sophistication is fundamental to increase innovation and attractiveness for investors but requires a stronger academic, industry, and government collaboration, (3) knowledge and technology outputs are limited when the domestic market is small, and the knowledge transfer policies are complex, and (4) the sustainability of an entrepreneurial ecosystem is fostered by the exposure to a crisis, robust national culture, and joint vision to reach sustainable development. This study provides evidence that shows a positive relationship between innovation and sustainable economic development, which makes this research even more relevant to our aim of supporting the Qatar National Vision 2030; at the same time, it contributes to the GCC literature and guides policymakers in the region.

show abstract

Identification of the relationships among the indicators of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems in agricultural startups

Cited by 20 publications

References 44 publications

Sustainable entrepreneurship and its determinants. The case of selected Central Eastern European Countries: From the global financial crisis to the COVID-19 pandemic

Sustainable entrepreneurship and its determinants. The case of selected Central Eastern European Countries: From the global financial crisis to the COVID-19 pandemic

Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Mechanisms

Toward a Sustainable Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Qatar

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About