2011 IEEE International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing 2011
DOI: 10.1109/p2p.2011.6038742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying, analyzing, and modeling flashcrowds in BitTorrent

Abstract: Abstract-Flashcrowds-sudden surges of user arrivals-do occur in BitTorrent, and they can lead to severe service deprivation. However, very little is known about their occurrence patterns and their characteristics in real-world deployments, and many basic questions about BitTorrent flashcrowds, such as How often do they occur? and How long do they last?, remain unanswered. In this paper, we address these questions by studying three datasets that cover millions of swarms from two of the largest BitTorrent tracke… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 8(b) plots the percentage of peers with higher progress among all the peers interesting to a peer, across all combinations of piece and peer selection policies. We have used an arrival rate of 0.05peers/s, which is the average value for popular content [31]; the results for other peer arrival rates showed similar results. In each scenario, the majority of the peers that are interesting to a peer have higher progress than itself, confirming our hypothesis.…”
Section: Analyzing Interestsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Figure 8(b) plots the percentage of peers with higher progress among all the peers interesting to a peer, across all combinations of piece and peer selection policies. We have used an arrival rate of 0.05peers/s, which is the average value for popular content [31]; the results for other peer arrival rates showed similar results. In each scenario, the majority of the peers that are interesting to a peer have higher progress than itself, confirming our hypothesis.…”
Section: Analyzing Interestsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The P2P analyst can extract information about the service level provided by BitTorrent to its users by examining the ratio between seeders and leechers in swarms, which is known to be correlated with download speed [23] and with severe degradation of performance during flashcrowds [24]. The life time of swarms is an indicator of reliability [25]: for how long are files available in the system?…”
Section: P2p Analyst Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These larger subsets include months of data for several BitTorrent trackers, and are thus representative for the types of measurement studies already published about BitTorrent [22], [24]. Table IV summarizes the characteristics of the 100 GB BTWorld subset used in this work.…”
Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, because in peer-to-peer systems the users provide additional service capacity while being online, a (long) flashcrowd can lead to a beneficial accumulation of (bandwidth) capacity rather than to poor performance. However, even through 2009 and 2010 the performance of BitTorrent users during flashcrowds could be up to an order of magnitude lower than the performance observed in normal conditions [25].…”
Section: Failures In Real-world Distributed Systemsmentioning
confidence: 83%