2014
DOI: 10.1186/s13021-014-0010-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying areas of deforestation risk for REDD+ using a species modeling tool

Abstract: BackgroundTo implement the REDD+ mechanism (Reducing Emissions for Deforestation and Forest Degradation, countries need to prioritize areas to combat future deforestation CO2 emissions, identify the drivers of deforestation around which to develop mitigation actions, and quantify and value carbon for financial mechanisms. Each comes with its own methodological challenges, and existing approaches and tools to do so can be costly to implement or require considerable technical knowledge and skill. Here, we presen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Several machine learning techniques and land cover change prediction models have been developed to project future deforestation based on where it has occurred historically (Harris et al 2008, Fuller et al 2011, Rosa et al 2013, Aguilar-Amuchastegui et al 2014. Despite differences in model structure and complexity, most require at least two land cover maps as well as spatial information about the biophysical and socioeconomic factors that correlate with observed change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several machine learning techniques and land cover change prediction models have been developed to project future deforestation based on where it has occurred historically (Harris et al 2008, Fuller et al 2011, Rosa et al 2013, Aguilar-Amuchastegui et al 2014. Despite differences in model structure and complexity, most require at least two land cover maps as well as spatial information about the biophysical and socioeconomic factors that correlate with observed change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MaxEnt requires presence-only data and information from one point in time to estimate LUCC probabilities. As pointed out by Aguilar-Amuchastegui et al [33], MaxEnt is straightforward to use, free, well tested in a variety of applications, and versatile. Still, while the maximum entropy approach can be used for the identification of areas suitable to experience LUCC, as an SDM, MaxEnt lacks the additional computation step commonly found in standard LUCC models to forecast quantities of change through time (e.g., deforestation rates).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relatively new approach to model LUCC relies on the Maximum Entropy Principle [28][29][30], extensively adopted for the identification of species niches in ecological studies and presence-only models [31,32]. This approach can be used for the identification of forest areas likely to experience conversion to alternative land uses given a set of environmental and socio-economic restrictions (e.g., [33]). Among the advantages of LUCC models based on the Maximum Entropy Principle is their ability to incorporate multiple data types (e.g., continuous and categorical) and establish complex relationships among predictor variables, through the use of machine-learning algorithms [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, limited data availability can hamper their use in some developing countries [20][21][22]. In this paper we present a new approach based on the Random Forest algorithm [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%