2016 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icws.2016.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Core Users Based on Trust Relationships and Interest Similarity in Recommender System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More real datasets would be considered, which would have improved the accuracy of the proposed system. Cao Gaofeng, and Li Kuang [16] conducted experiments and the results of the experiments demonstrated the usefulness of extraction of core users and proved that ~20% core users permit recommender systems to attain >90% accuracy of top-N recommendation. However, the authors were unable to determine more approaches to define core users from different aspects (e.g., fusing similar relationships and trust relationships).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 94%
“…More real datasets would be considered, which would have improved the accuracy of the proposed system. Cao Gaofeng, and Li Kuang [16] conducted experiments and the results of the experiments demonstrated the usefulness of extraction of core users and proved that ~20% core users permit recommender systems to attain >90% accuracy of top-N recommendation. However, the authors were unable to determine more approaches to define core users from different aspects (e.g., fusing similar relationships and trust relationships).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 94%
“…(1) Random: this approach randomly selects a user member from the social network as the prospective friends or neighbors of user u # . (2) Core-user [19]: this approach first searches for the core users (i.e., key users) with maximal social influences from user candidates and then finds out the friends of user u # based on the core users. (3) Exact-match: this approach exactly compares the feedback records left by user members and u # ; if their feedback records are exactly the same, then they can be regarded as similar friends or neighbors.…”
Section: Experimental Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our Ser Rec S BT +CF approach with other three ones, i.e., WSRec [9], Rec S BT +CF [13] and coreusers-NBI [11]. Concretely, in WSRec, r * (user target ) (i.e., user target 's average rating over all his/her invoked services) and r * (ws j ) (i.e., ws j 's average rating from all the users who invoked ws j ) are considered.…”
Section: Experiments Dataset and Deploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%