2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00252-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying critical limits for soil quality indicators in agro-ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
271
0
33

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 543 publications
(307 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
271
0
33
Order By: Relevance
“…A estimativa de atributos edáficos relacionados à sua funcionalidade possibilitaria monitorar indiretamente a qualidade do solo (Reinert, 1998) e sua utilização como indicadores importantes para o planejamento e a avaliação de práticas de manejo que sejam ecológica e economicamente viáveis (Doran & Zeiss, 2000;Arshad & Martin, 2002;Bouma, 2002). Contudo, no Brasil, a utilização desses indicadores em áreas degradadas é recente, e as pesquisas relacionadas à recuperação dessas áreas estão ainda formando suas bases de dados, por meio de programas de monitoramento das atividades empregadas no sentido de melhorar a qualidade do ambiente (Campello et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…A estimativa de atributos edáficos relacionados à sua funcionalidade possibilitaria monitorar indiretamente a qualidade do solo (Reinert, 1998) e sua utilização como indicadores importantes para o planejamento e a avaliação de práticas de manejo que sejam ecológica e economicamente viáveis (Doran & Zeiss, 2000;Arshad & Martin, 2002;Bouma, 2002). Contudo, no Brasil, a utilização desses indicadores em áreas degradadas é recente, e as pesquisas relacionadas à recuperação dessas áreas estão ainda formando suas bases de dados, por meio de programas de monitoramento das atividades empregadas no sentido de melhorar a qualidade do ambiente (Campello et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Moreover, an analysis on changes of soil properties due to the land use change can support decision and policy-making processes at regional and national levels. These include soil physical, chemical and/or biological properties (Nambiar et al, 2001;Arshad and Martin, 2002;Doran, 2002;Mulugeta et al, 2005). Their changes may be assessed by measuring and comparing present values against the values at the commencement of the monitoring period (Arshad and Martin, 2002), historical data when available (Hartemink, 1998), and soil properties under reference ecosystems (Feigl et al, 1995;Wang and Gong, 1998), or by using values measured at different time intervals (Mulugeta et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sustainability state of a system is typically assessed by comparing current or predicted indicator states with selected reference states. Reference states have been defined by critical limits, margins of tolerance (Gomez et al 1996;Arshad and Martin 2002) or by a reference system (Abbona et al 2007). Yet, there is a lack of generality related to the choice and specification of the reference state (Girardin et al 1999;Arshad and Martin 2002;Büchs 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference states have been defined by critical limits, margins of tolerance (Gomez et al 1996;Arshad and Martin 2002) or by a reference system (Abbona et al 2007). Yet, there is a lack of generality related to the choice and specification of the reference state (Girardin et al 1999;Arshad and Martin 2002;Büchs 2003). An example of a conceptual problem is the comparison of an 'unsustainable' reference state with a 'more sustainable' alternative, which would demonstrate some improvement in sustainability, but could hardly be viewed as 'sustainable'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation