2018
DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Differences Between Cut Marks Made on Bone by a Machete and Katana: A Pilot Study

Abstract: The aim of this research was to identify characteristics specific to a machete and katana on three different bone types. One machete and two katanas were used to produce cut marks on Sus scrofa rib, flat and long bones. Fifty-nine cuts were produced by the katanas and 38 by the machete. The presence of flaking, feathering, peeling, micropeeling, chattering, microcurvature, scoop defect, and exit notch was noted, and bivariate associations between each characteristic and weapon type were assessed using Pearson'… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, we found a beveled appearance of the bone, revealing the bone marrow with a detachment from the bone structure. This appearance is between the “Peeling” and “exit notch” aspects described in the paper of McCardle and Stojanovski [16]. Therefore, according to this research, the type of weapon is compatible with a “katana” [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, we found a beveled appearance of the bone, revealing the bone marrow with a detachment from the bone structure. This appearance is between the “Peeling” and “exit notch” aspects described in the paper of McCardle and Stojanovski [16]. Therefore, according to this research, the type of weapon is compatible with a “katana” [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Stojanovski [16]. Therefore, according to this research, the type of weapon is compatible with a "katana" [16].…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 70%
“…8 Research papers have focused on the identification of weapons by microscopic analysis of cut marks left on bones in chop wounds. 9,10 The shinken involved or examined in those case reports and research papers have had long blades greater than 60 cm (katana), whereas the sword used in the present case report had a shorter blade between 60 and 30 cm (wakizashi). Short blades less than 30 cm (tanto) have reportedly been used to inflict stab-incised wounds 3 to the neck in jigai (ritual suicide).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The bones were examined using the characteristics for hacking trauma (Table 2) as defined by Symes et al (4), Humphrey and Hutchinson (28), and McCardle and Stojanovski (29). This included examining and recording the presence or absence of the following characteristics: clean cut, crushing, flaking, feathering, chattering, V‐shaped kerfs, and bounce marks, seen as small secondary impact sites (5,28,29). These bounce marks occurred when the implement recoiled after the initial impact and created another mark near the initial defect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%