2008
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying differential correlation in gene/pathway combinations

Abstract: Background: An important emerging trend in the analysis of microarray data is to incorporate known pathway information a priori. Expression level "summaries" for pathways, obtained from the expression data for the genes constituting the pathway, permit the inclusion of pathway information, reduce the high dimensionality of microarray data, and have the power to elucidate gene-interaction dependencies which are not already accounted for through known pathway identification.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several groups have developed formal methods to analyze differential correlation (reviewed in (de la Fuente, 2010)). Some methods determine whether pre-specified gene sets are differently correlated in two conditions (Braun et al, 2008; Choi and Kendziorski, 2009), while others discover gene sets directly from the data (Watson, 2006). We used CARMEN to calculate differential correlation between tail and dorsal telogen tissues ( Methods ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups have developed formal methods to analyze differential correlation (reviewed in (de la Fuente, 2010)). Some methods determine whether pre-specified gene sets are differently correlated in two conditions (Braun et al, 2008; Choi and Kendziorski, 2009), while others discover gene sets directly from the data (Watson, 2006). We used CARMEN to calculate differential correlation between tail and dorsal telogen tissues ( Methods ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This extension would, however, come at a substantial computational cost and would require a challenging reformulation of the prior over graphs p(G), to penalize for model complexity and, at the same time, to favor models closer to the structure of the prior pathway G0. Initial progress in this direction was reported by Braun, Cope and Parmigiani (2008) and, in the context of Bayesian Networks, by Mukherjee and Speed (2008) and it is the subject of active research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending this idea, we proposed a method [62] in which the pathway summary values and genes not known to be on the pathway were tested for differential correlation. In the “Gene×Pathway Correlation (GPC) Score” method [62], we first computed pathway summary values based on the first PC for every pathway of interest, yielding for each pathway j a value p j,m summarizing sample m ’s expression across pathway j ’s genes.…”
Section: 3 Identifying Functional Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the “Gene×Pathway Correlation (GPC) Score” method [62], we first computed pathway summary values based on the first PC for every pathway of interest, yielding for each pathway j a value p j,m summarizing sample m ’s expression across pathway j ’s genes. For each gene i with expression g i,m in sample m , we compute the GPC-score as the difference in the correlations of g and p in the case and control phenotype,…”
Section: 3 Identifying Functional Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation