2018
DOI: 10.1159/000492254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Differentially Expressed MicroRNAs Between Cirrhotic and Non-Cirrhotic Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Exploring Their Functions Using Bioinformatic Analysis

et al.

Abstract: Background/Aims: Few studies have been designed to directly investigate the exact mechanisms underlying the different phenotypes between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to illuminate the incidence and developmental mechanisms for both types of HCC through differentially expressed microRNAs (miRNAs) using bioinformatic analysis. Methods: The miRNA-seq data and clinical data of patients (from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database) were utilized to determine differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may help explain why none of the lncRNAs in our risk scoring systems occurs in the previously published risk scoring systems for HCC prognosis. The importance of developing prognostic tools for HCC with cirrhosis is underscored by the observation of several microRNAs differentially expressed between patients with or without cirrhosis, particularly mir-149 (Mei et al, 2018), miR-24 and miR-27a (Salvi et al, 2013). These differences may help explain the different prognosis in the two types of HCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may help explain why none of the lncRNAs in our risk scoring systems occurs in the previously published risk scoring systems for HCC prognosis. The importance of developing prognostic tools for HCC with cirrhosis is underscored by the observation of several microRNAs differentially expressed between patients with or without cirrhosis, particularly mir-149 (Mei et al, 2018), miR-24 and miR-27a (Salvi et al, 2013). These differences may help explain the different prognosis in the two types of HCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since most miRNA have a moderate (<3-fold) difference between cases and controls and both large intra-individual and inter-individual variation, large sample sizes are required for sufficient power to minimize type 1 and II errors. Replication using public datasets [e.g., the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database] may provide additional supporting evidence (145,146). (2) Validation for circulating miRNAs: To develop liquid biopsies for detection, diagnosis, and prognosis, miRNAs identified from serum/plasma should be validated to miRNAs obtained from tumor tissue before clinical evaluation as biomarkers.…”
Section: Challenges and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since most miRNA have a moderate (<3-fold) difference between cases and controls and both large intra-individual and inter-individual variation, large sample sizes are required for sufficient power to minimize type 1 and II errors. Replication using public datasets [e.g., the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database] may provide additional supporting evidence ( 145 , 146 ).…”
Section: Challenges and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a prognostic factor, low level and down-regulation of miRNA-542 and miRNA-139 are associated with poor prognosis as vascular invasion, larger tumor size and metastatic disease [79,80] . Expression of miRNA profile in the histopathological analysis after HCC resection can predict the risk of HCC recurrence within the Milan criteria [81] , HCC miRNAs expression varies between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic HCC [82] . Remarkably, miRNAs like miR503HG suppress metastasis and inhibit malignant cell migration.…”
Section: Annexin A2mentioning
confidence: 99%