2004
DOI: 10.1660/0022-8443(2004)107[0105:iharlc]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying historical and recent land-cover changes in Kansas using post-classification change detection techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Post-classification technique was used to compare between the classified imagery. Post-classification is a term describing the comparative analysis of spectral classifications for different dates produced independently (Peterson et al, 2004;Singh, 1989). Despite criticisms focussing on accumulation of the inherent errors of each individual classification, this is the most appropriate method for comparing multi-source data, as each data layer can be generalized to a common LULC scheme before being compared (Petit and Lambin, 2001).…”
Section: Study Area Data and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-classification technique was used to compare between the classified imagery. Post-classification is a term describing the comparative analysis of spectral classifications for different dates produced independently (Peterson et al, 2004;Singh, 1989). Despite criticisms focussing on accumulation of the inherent errors of each individual classification, this is the most appropriate method for comparing multi-source data, as each data layer can be generalized to a common LULC scheme before being compared (Petit and Lambin, 2001).…”
Section: Study Area Data and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantages of post-classification change detection are that it provides relatively accurate change detection while avoiding the difficulties associated with the analysis of images acquired at different times of year or by different sensors (Peterson et al 2004;Singh 1989;Coppin et al 2004). The post-classification change detection method was employed to identify conversions of one particular land use category to other land use categories over different time periods, locations, and areal extents.…”
Section: Land Cover Change Detection Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a variety of studies, post-classification change detection has been considered to be one of the most suitable and commonly used methods for change detection (Singh, 1989;Mas, 1999, Jensen,1996Peterson et al, 2004). Post-classification is a term describing the comparative analysis of spectral classifications for different dates produced independently (Singh, 1989).…”
Section: Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%