Interspeech 2019 2019
DOI: 10.21437/interspeech.2019-3092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Input Features for Development of Real-Time Translation of Neural Signals to Text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Correspondingly, the percentage of channels removed per subject was ∼8%-9%. The localization and relevance of the remaining electrodes are briefly studied both, in the discussion section of this paper using an ablation study as well as, in a previous paper (Sheth et al 2019). In the latter we also address the different parts of speech that these electrodes encode.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Correspondingly, the percentage of channels removed per subject was ∼8%-9%. The localization and relevance of the remaining electrodes are briefly studied both, in the discussion section of this paper using an ablation study as well as, in a previous paper (Sheth et al 2019). In the latter we also address the different parts of speech that these electrodes encode.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A frequency band as referred to in this manuscript, is the band-pass filtered oscillatory activity of the group of neurons probed using our depth electrodes. The motivation for such an experiment was that previous studies (Chang et al 2013, Herff et al 2015, Moses et al 2016 have used bands up to high gamma (70-150 Hz) to map unto underlying speech, but a preliminary analysis found tuning in a greater range of frequencies for several of our subjects (figure 2) (Sheth et al 2019).…”
Section: Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%