2018
DOI: 10.1007/s41109-017-0042-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying network structure similarity using spectral graph theory

Abstract: Most real networks are too large or they are not available for real time analysis. Therefore, in practice, decisions are made based on partial information about the ground truth network. It is of great interest to have metrics to determine if an inferred network (the partial information network) is similar to the ground truth. In this paper we develop a test for similarity between the inferred and the true network. Our research utilizes a network visualization tool, which systematically discovers a network, pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we focused on scaling and universality from a random matrix theory point of view. We would like to stress that even though we already have some previous experience with scaling studies of random network models (see, e.g., [ 5 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 32 ]), this is the first time we apply this technique to non-Hermitian adjacency matrices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, we focused on scaling and universality from a random matrix theory point of view. We would like to stress that even though we already have some previous experience with scaling studies of random network models (see, e.g., [ 5 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 32 ]), this is the first time we apply this technique to non-Hermitian adjacency matrices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, random weights have been used in other complex network models; see some examples in [ 14 , 15 ]. We have named this model as the ER fully -random network model [ 5 , 16 , 17 ]. The sparsity is defined as the fraction of the independent non-vanishing off-diagonal adjacency matrix elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, to identify ER-normal ceRNA network comparable to ER+ normal reference ceRNA network, we applied different correlation cutoff values (0 to 1 with a step size of 0.01) on the miRNA target site share network for ER-normal samples, and select the correlation cutoff values that makes ER-normal ceRNA network most similar to ER+ normal reference ceRNA network. To estimate topological similarity, we employed normalized Laplacian Matrix Eigenvalue Distribution that discovers ensembles of Erdős-Rényi graphs better than other metrics such as Sequential Adjacency or Laplacian [30]. After identifying the ER+ normal reference network and the corresponding ERnormal network, we used the same cutoffs (0.6 for ER+ subtypes and 0.68 for ER-subtypes) to construct the ER+ tumor network and the ER-tumor network, respectively.…”
Section: Building Subtype Cerna Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since normal samples should have similar molecular dynamics between ER+ and ER-, we sought to find the co-expression cutoff for ER-normal network that yields the most topological similarity to the ER+ reference network. To estimate topological similarity, we employed a normalized Laplacian Matrix Eigenvalue Distribution that discovers ensembles of Erdős-Rényi graphs better than other metrics, such as Sequential Adjacency or Laplacian [30] (see Methods). While ER-normal network topology changes drastically if different correlation cutoff values are used (S. Fig.…”
Section: Two-step Pairwise Normalization Of Er+ and Er-cerna Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%