2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/5861414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Recurring Bottlenecks on Urban Expressway Using a Fusion Method Based on Loop Detector Data

Abstract: e accurate identification of recurrent bottlenecks has been an important assumption of many studies on traffic congestion analysis and management. As one of the most widely used traffic detection devices, loop detectors can provide reliable multidimensional data for traffic bottleneck identification. Although great efforts have been put on developing bottleneck identification methods based on loop detector data, the existing studies are less informative with respect to providing accurate position of the bottle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It made it possible to estimate the seasonal variation in road traffic in urban environments. Furthermore, the average daily volumes for all days of the week and the average daily volumes by specific day of the week were calculated for each group of roads [24,25]. A graph was used to compare the daily traffic volumes by day of the week with the average daily volumes by week.…”
Section: Data Filtration and Statistical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It made it possible to estimate the seasonal variation in road traffic in urban environments. Furthermore, the average daily volumes for all days of the week and the average daily volumes by specific day of the week were calculated for each group of roads [24,25]. A graph was used to compare the daily traffic volumes by day of the week with the average daily volumes by week.…”
Section: Data Filtration and Statistical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, 2020 Stathopoulos and Karlaftis [23] or Aunet [2]. In their studies, some have identified different variations of traffic in different working weeks relating to the activities of the population in the area [5,10,25]. Due to the fact that traffic volumes on the roads are formed under a great influence of the catchment area, other authors also studied the relationships between traffic variations and catchment areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with urban traffic congestion, there are fewer studies that focus on traffic congestion in expressways. The existing studies are based on different data and methods to investigate traffic congestion in expressways [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] and analyze the characteristics of traffic congestion in expressways [41][42][43][44][45]. The summary of representative studies about traffic congestion in expressways is listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as a result of the limited spatial coverage of loop detectors and the quality issues with the data (for example, inconsistency and missing values), the identification results are compromised. To improve the identification results, methods to refine loop detector data and the application of new data sources in bottleneck identification have been studied intensively (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Tang et al (11) proposed a fusing method that identifies bottlenecks based on loop detector data of multiple temporal granularities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the identification results, methods to refine loop detector data and the application of new data sources in bottleneck identification have been studied intensively (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Tang et al (11) proposed a fusing method that identifies bottlenecks based on loop detector data of multiple temporal granularities. Song et al (13) addressed the issues of invalid and inconsistent data in loop detector data by adding a denoising component into the bottleneck identification process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%