2019
DOI: 10.2514/1.a34196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Retrofitting Opportunities for Federated Satellite Systems

Abstract: This paper aims at identifying retrofitting possibilities to incorporate existing spacecraft into a network of federated satellite systems. The paper presents a systematic review of possible retrofitting options, such as direct modifications including replacement and addition of interfaces, and indirect modifications through the addition of intermediary federated negotiators. The paper considers existing frequency regulations for the analysis in the technical domain, but does not take into consideration how co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The federation as a single System of Systems, SoS, has unique characteristics and requirements that the sum of its parts should meet. At the same time, every single participating satellite still keeps its original primary designated mission [16].…”
Section: A Setting Up the Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The federation as a single System of Systems, SoS, has unique characteristics and requirements that the sum of its parts should meet. At the same time, every single participating satellite still keeps its original primary designated mission [16].…”
Section: A Setting Up the Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T history of distributed satellite systems is nearly as old as as spaceflight itself [1]. While early satellite clusters and constellations focused on operating together to perform a single function, work within the last decade has investigated Federated Space Systems (FSS) [2,3]. FSS are a collaborative type of system-of-systems (SoS), in which there is no central authority to enforce SoS level design goals and decisions [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%