2003
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying software project risks in Nigeria: an International Comparative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be an indication to the presence of lack of adequate knowledge among project managers. Research shows that project management knowledge limitation is one of the risks hampering project success (Keil et al, 2008;Mursu et al, 2003;Shaikh & Ahsan, 2014). It was also found common to perform risk identification, but not continue with risk analysis and development of mitigation or response plan.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be an indication to the presence of lack of adequate knowledge among project managers. Research shows that project management knowledge limitation is one of the risks hampering project success (Keil et al, 2008;Mursu et al, 2003;Shaikh & Ahsan, 2014). It was also found common to perform risk identification, but not continue with risk analysis and development of mitigation or response plan.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…User acceptance of new IS applications are hindered by factors such as change in cultural, social and business norms and values. In addition, IS projects in DC are affected by factors also common in developed countries such as inadequate fund and misunderstanding of user needs (Addison & Vallabh, 2002;Gichoya, 2005;Mansell, 1999;Mursu et al, 2003). Galliers et al (1998) emphasize that poor planning is one of the major reasons for project failure in DC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Delphi method has been used in various business disciplines including accounting (Garsombke and Cerrulo 1984), auditing (Baldwin-Morgan 1993, Ramamoorti et al 1999, banking (Bradley and Stewart 2002), international business (Czinkota and Ronkainen 1997), and business process engineering (Zarei 2001). In information systems research, the use of the Delphi technique has been ubiquitous for decades (for example, Addison 2003, Mursu et al 2003, Bourqe et al 2002, McCoy 2001, Holsapple and Joshi 2001, Schmidt et al 2001, Hayne and Pollard 2000, Keil et al 1998, Brancheau and Wetherbe 1987.…”
Section: Delphi Survey Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most notable differences compared to the risk factors in the United States, Hong Kong, and Finland dealt with the socio-economic context of the country, infrastructure, and relationships with inexperienced users. Only a few items on the list deal with the technical aspects of software development (Mursu et al 2003). The checklist of risk factors can guide less experienced Nigerian software project managers to address them early enough.…”
Section: Recommendations On Isd: Participation Risk and Sustainabilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of respondents decreased from 39 to 6, and it was concluded that consensus was not achieved in Nigeria. (Mursu et al 2003) …”
Section: Landscape View Through Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%