2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying threats to Pyrenean brook newt (Calotriton asper) to improve decision making in conservation management: A literature review complemented by expert-driven knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current rate of world extinctions is estimated to be between eight and 100 times higher than the background extinction rate (Ceballos et al, 2015). Habitat loss is the single biggest threat to biodiversity, but invasive species, exploitation, disease, and anthropogenic climate change also pose significant ongoing threats (Díaz et al, 2020;Maxwell, Fuller, Brooks, & Watson, 2016;Sax & Gaines, 2008). Diagnosing the causes of species' decline and extinction is often complex, as threats may operate independently, synergistically, successively, or at different locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current rate of world extinctions is estimated to be between eight and 100 times higher than the background extinction rate (Ceballos et al, 2015). Habitat loss is the single biggest threat to biodiversity, but invasive species, exploitation, disease, and anthropogenic climate change also pose significant ongoing threats (Díaz et al, 2020;Maxwell, Fuller, Brooks, & Watson, 2016;Sax & Gaines, 2008). Diagnosing the causes of species' decline and extinction is often complex, as threats may operate independently, synergistically, successively, or at different locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expert elicitation is a well‐established approach for dealing with uncertainties in biodiversity conservation when primary evidence is limited or inconsistent, as consolidated opinions of a range of individuals are generally more accurate than those of one or few experts (Burgman et al, 2011; Martin et al, 2012; McBride et al, 2012). For example, Geyle et al (2020) used expert elicitation to evaluate the extinction risk of Australia’s most imperilled squamate species and Dalibard, Buisson, Riberon and Laffaile (2020) used expert judgement to assist with identifying the primary threats to the Pyrenean brook newt ( Calotriton asper ). Expert elicitation is becoming increasingly sophisticated as the biases in judgment are better understood (Hemming, Burgman, Hanea, McBride, & Wintle, 2018; Roy, Peyton, & Booy, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, few studies have focused on the effects of water quality on the Pyrenean brook newt (Montori et al, 1982). Yet chemical and physical perturbations induced by agricultural activities could affect water quality, hence limiting the Pyrenean brook newt presence (Dalibard et al, 2020; Pottier et al, 2021), by affecting larval development for example (Rouse et al, 1999). Our results seem to support this hypothesis, as the most suitable stream reaches for the Pyrenean brook newt were predicted to be surrounded by no or small surfaces allocated to agriculture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%