2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

20
1,719
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,578 publications
(1,744 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
20
1,719
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown in PascualMarqui et al (2011) to give an improved connectivity measure as compared to the imaginary coherence proposed by Nolte et al (2004).…”
Section: Data Conditioningmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It has been shown in PascualMarqui et al (2011) to give an improved connectivity measure as compared to the imaginary coherence proposed by Nolte et al (2004).…”
Section: Data Conditioningmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nolte et al, 2004) between time series x and y in the frequency band ω is: ( 1) which is based on the cross-spectrum given by the covariance and variances of the signals, and where i is the imaginary unit ( 1  ). The squared modulus of the coherence is: …”
Section: Data Conditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been intensely used in EEG literature to describe the dependency between two scalp locations, however it is inflated by the artificial in-phase (zero-lag) correlation engendered by volume conduction (Nunez and Srinivasan 2006). Recently Nolte et al (2004) proposed to consider instead the "imaginary part" of the coherency (the non-squared coherence)…”
Section: Group Blind Source Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the size of the brain volumes studied makes the chances of observing signal leakage statistically more likely, and for this reason an effective means to reduce leakage between the data matrices and is of key importance. It is well known that leakage gives rise to a zerophase-lag linear interaction between projected signals, this fact has been exploited in previous methods (Nolte et al, 2004, Stam et al, 2007, Brookes et al, 2012b, Hipp et al, 2012 where zerophase-lag interaction is removed prior to connectivity assessment. In this paper we implement a multivariate extension to previous work (see appendix (Brookes et al, 2012b, Hipp et al, 2012) in which linear regression is employed to supress zero-phase-lag interaction between the seed and test…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%