Identity as a Variable

Abstract

As scholarly interest in the concept of identity continues to grow, social identities are proving to be crucially important for understanding contemporary life. Despite-or perhaps because of-the sprawl of different treatments of identity in the social sciences, the concept has remained too analytically loose to be as useful a tool as the literature's early promise had suggested. We propose to solve this longstanding problem by developing the analytical rigor and methodological imagination that will make identity a more useful variable for the social sciences. This article offers more precision by defining collective identity as a social category that varies along two dimensions-content and contestation. Content describes the meaning of a collective identity. The content of social identities may take the form of four non-mutually-exclusive types: constitutive norms; social purposes; relational comparisons with other social categories; and cognitive models. Contestation refers to the degree of agreement within a group over the content of the shared category. Our conceptualization thus enables collective identities to be compared according to the agreement and disagreement about their meanings by the members of the group. The final section of the article looks at the methodology of identity scholarship. Addressing the wide array of methodological options on identity-including discourse analysis, surveys, and content analysis, as well as promising newer methods like experiments, agent-based modeling, and cognitive mapping-we hope to provide the kind of brush clearing that will enable the field to move forward methodologically as well. for comments on this version.

The EU under a realist scope: Employing a neoclassical realist framework for the analysis of the EU’s Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement offer to Ukraine

“…26 Thus, identity acts as a kind of mental framework for decision-makers, a filter which makes sense of systemic pressures and how an entity should appropriately respond. 27 Consequently, identity plays a constricting role in foreign policy formation as it narrows the options available to decision-makers.…”

Toward Conceptualizing Race and Racial Identity Development Within an Attractor Landscape

“…This is complicated by the difficulties associated with understanding and analyzing the macro-micro reality and intersubjectivity of social phenomena such as race or ethnicity (see Gillespie & Cornish, 2010;Jaspal & Cinnirella, 2012;Morçöl, 2012;Sawyer, 2005;Törrönen, 2014). Even newer research techniques, such as agent-based modeling, are insufficient for gaining a complete understanding of complex racial dynamics because of innumerous perceptions and countless interactions among personal characteristics and the environment (Abdelal, Herrera, Johnston, & McDermott, 2006;Bednar & Page, 2007;Harrell, 2000;Smaldino, Pickett, Sherman, & Schank, 2012;Spencer et al, 1997). These difficulties and limitations collectively lend credence to Tyson's (2017) aphorism in the second epigraph.…”

Legitimising Emerging Power Diplomacy: an Analysis of Government and Media Discourses on Brazilian Foreign Policy under Lula

“…Based on a constructivist framework, it is considered that the conduct of external relations is a practice through which a State materialises its identity. Identities are not given a priori, but socially conferred and legitimated through a practical and ideational process of elaboration, enactment and feedback (Wendt 1992;Barnett 1999;Marcussen et al 1999;Guillaume 2002;Abdelal et al 2006). While the practical part is carried out mainly by States in the course of their continued interactions, non-state actors can play an important role in the legitimation of ideas and interpretations.…”