Identity-Based Signature With Server-Aided Verification Scheme for 5G Mobile Systems

Abstract

Recently, security and privacy issues in mobile communication systems became an enormous challenge due to the limited resources of mobile networks regarding communication overhead, computational cost, and battery power. 5G systems provide high performance and flexibility that can connect billion of objects through Heterogeneous Wireless Networks (HWN) concerning the Internet of Things (IoT). However, some of these security challenges can be addressed by using outsourced assistants such as Server-Aided Verification (SAV) to contribute partially with the authentication process among 5G network entities. In this paper, we propose an efficient and secure identity-based signature scheme with Server-Aided Verification for 5G mobile systems (IBS-SAV). We provide a performance evaluation based on security proof of the proposed IBS-SAV scheme under existential unforgeable in the random oracle model as well as the security against collusion and adaptive chosen message attack (EUF-CMA). The performance evaluation and security analysis demonstrate that our IBS-SAV scheme is not only secure but also can reduce the communication and computation complexity for mobile systems efficiently. INDEX TERMS Public key cryptography (PKC), identity-based signature (IBS), server-aided verification (SAV), 5G mobile systems.

A Provably Secure Lightweight Subtree-Based Short Signature Scheme With Fuzzy User Data Sharing for Human-Centered IoT

“…It is seen from Table 3 and from Fig. 5 that, the proposed scheme for verification stage is efficient than the schemes Shen et al [44], and Ramadan et al [46]. It is also seen from Table 3 that the schemes He et al [45], and Zhang et al [47] are more efficient than the proposed SSS in this paper for verification stage.…”

“…It has seen from Table 3 that the proposed scheme is efficient in signing stage in comparison with He et al [45], and Zhang et al [47]. It has also seen from Table 3 that the schemes Shen et al [44], and Ramadan et al [46] performing better than the proposed scheme in signing stage. Fig.…”

“…We evaluated the performance of our SSS scheme over the existing schemes presented in Shen et al [44] scheme, He et al [45] scheme, Ramadan et al [46] scheme, and Zhang et al [47] scheme. The comparison has been done based on the computational cost of these methods.…”

“…The computational cost for ℎ ℎ is considered as 0.503 ms [52]. In this paper, the proposed scheme has been compared to [44][45][46][47]. Table 3 show the comparison based on the computational cost for signing stage and the verification stage.…”

A Development of Embedded Anomaly Behavior Packet Detection System for IoT Environment using Machine Learning Techniques

“…These security systems solved the various specification problem and the applying problem partially. However, most of the existing system offers rule-based or signature-based attack detection that has difficulty in countering the new attack techniques that frequently occur [13]- [15].…”