2010
DOI: 10.1080/10510971003757147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identity Gaps of Contemporary U.S. Immigrants: Acknowledging Divergent Communicative Experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The narratives were examined to detect traces of the three types of conflicting forces described by relational dialectics: disclosure/nondisclosure, autonomy/connection, and stability/change. The dialectical categories were employed only when the narrative referenced identity gaps, operationalized as unresolved challenges or puzzles relating to personal, enacted, relational, or communal identity (Urban & Orbe, ). Narrative analysis has been deemed especially appropriate “for the study of identities, specifically the negotiation of multiple and stigmatized identities” (Faulkner & Hecht, , p. 834) because it reveals the dynamics of how testimonies enact selfhood for public presentation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The narratives were examined to detect traces of the three types of conflicting forces described by relational dialectics: disclosure/nondisclosure, autonomy/connection, and stability/change. The dialectical categories were employed only when the narrative referenced identity gaps, operationalized as unresolved challenges or puzzles relating to personal, enacted, relational, or communal identity (Urban & Orbe, ). Narrative analysis has been deemed especially appropriate “for the study of identities, specifically the negotiation of multiple and stigmatized identities” (Faulkner & Hecht, , p. 834) because it reveals the dynamics of how testimonies enact selfhood for public presentation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu, Lum, and Chen (2001) add that a practitioner must also be critically thinking and should consider using their client as a cultural informant (Hurdle, 2002). Urban and Orbe (2010) refer to the multidimensional and holistic nature of identity in interconnected layers: personally in self-concept and definition, actively in the social practice that a person manifests, relationally in how identities are negotiated with others, and communally as the beliefs and discourse or collective memory of various communities affect the person. They also refer to identity gaps: between the sense of self and the ability to communicate this to others; between the outsider's perceptions of a person as different than that person's self-concept; and between the person's self-concept, the self the person portrays to others, and the identity that is actually seen and accepted by others (Al-Krenawi, 2012;Urban & Orbe, 2010, p. 306).…”
Section: Sorting Through Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will consider what effect essentializing or stereotyping has on a client's need, desire, or capacity for acculturation, as well as to what degree the society and social worker are willing to adapt to the client (Abu Baker, 2003;Al-Krenawi & Graham, 2005;Kumar, Seay, & Karabenick, 2011). The practitioner must resist two temptations: first, to jump to any conclusion as to which specific aspect of a person's cultural and personal background is more germane to their self-identity and, second, that a person is in fact interested in acculturating into the American community, particularly as many may only be here temporarily for scholastic or professional engagements (Urban & Orbe, 2010).…”
Section: Sorting Through Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals who reported more trait communication apprehension and less assertiveness (Jung, 2011), more discrimination and less acculturation (Jung, Hecht, & Wadsworth, 2007;Wadsworth, Hecht, & Jung, 2008), and decreased intercultural communication competence also reported more identity gaps. Specific to the college context, international (Urban & Orbe, 2010;Wadsworth et al, 2008) and first-generation (Orbe, 2004) college students fare better when the university or classroom communication culture shares some resemblance with their native culture. Students who perceive themselves as less communicatively competent or as though their classmates do not accept them may also have a negative self-esteem (Leary, Tambor, Terdal, & Downs, 1995;Richmond, McCroskey, & McCroskey, 1989).…”
Section: Cti and Identity Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%