Identity, trust, and the experiences of refugees during a COVID-19 lockdown

Abstract

This paper examines the experiences of refugees in a developing country during its first COVID-19 lockdown by utilizing a two-stage qualitative data analysis of 39 interviews with refugees and asylum-seekers. We find that their experiences during the lockdown are shaped by identity, trauma and help from external parties–such as community leaders and local non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Experiences during the pandemic in turn moderate the relationship between policy changes and trust in domestic authority figures, which consequently affects attitudes towards and compliance with public health measures put in place to contain the pandemic. We then explore the role of identity in refugees’ pandemic experiences by comparing the differences between two refugee groups (Syrians and Rohingyas), validating them by utilizing comparative thematic analysis. Finally, the paper presents policy implications for crisis response in developing countries by suggesting improvements that can be made on the ground regarding the delivery of aid and assistance to vulnerable groups.

Facing the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Analysis of Asylum Seekers’ Experiences and Worries in the Canton of Vaud, Switzerland

“…Then, a mixed-method study showed a high prevalence of exposure to COVID-19, poor mental health, and frequent avoidance of healthcare among undocumented migrants [ 9 ]. Similarly, a qualitative study described the social and economic burden of the COVID-19 pandemic experienced by migrant populations [ 21 ]. Regarding the perception of migrant populations towards public health measures, such as lockdowns, our study confirms the ambivalent feelings also observed in shelters in France.…”

“…Similarly, asylum seekers with limited awareness or a lack of understanding of public health recommendations due to inadequate communication and language or cultural barriers may have experienced more worries about the COVID-19 pandemic (fear of being infected or dying) and greater mental health deterioration [ 20 , 21 ]. Previous literature has indeed identified inequities surrounding communication during pandemics, affecting linguistic minorities and socially excluded.…”