DOI: 10.5353/th_b5689270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ideology, identity and linguistic repertoires among South Asian students in Hong Kong

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, existing research on non-ethnically Chinese working class youth in Hong Kong shows that socioeconomic stratification shapes greatly these students' socio-institutional paths, socio-emotional experiences and senses of belonging (Erni & Leung 2014;Fleming 2015;Soto 2016), making necessary from research accounts of individuals (and groups) that go beyond those that obscure the complexity of reflexivity and of social change. Under these circumstances, we call in this article for an approach to reflexivity which heavily draws on long-standing research in the language disciplines that stems from pioneering contributions from philosophy of language (Austin 1962), linguistic anthropology (Hymes 1974;Silverstein 1976), conversation analysis (Sacks, Schegloff & Jefferson 1974), interactional sociolinguistics (Gumperz 1982;Rampton 1995), microsociology (Goffman 1981), communication studies (Bakhtin 1986) and critical sociolinguistics (Heller 2002;Martín-Rojo 2010;Duchêne, Moyer & Roberts 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, existing research on non-ethnically Chinese working class youth in Hong Kong shows that socioeconomic stratification shapes greatly these students' socio-institutional paths, socio-emotional experiences and senses of belonging (Erni & Leung 2014;Fleming 2015;Soto 2016), making necessary from research accounts of individuals (and groups) that go beyond those that obscure the complexity of reflexivity and of social change. Under these circumstances, we call in this article for an approach to reflexivity which heavily draws on long-standing research in the language disciplines that stems from pioneering contributions from philosophy of language (Austin 1962), linguistic anthropology (Hymes 1974;Silverstein 1976), conversation analysis (Sacks, Schegloff & Jefferson 1974), interactional sociolinguistics (Gumperz 1982;Rampton 1995), microsociology (Goffman 1981), communication studies (Bakhtin 1986) and critical sociolinguistics (Heller 2002;Martín-Rojo 2010;Duchêne, Moyer & Roberts 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%