2002
DOI: 10.1053/shem.2002.31919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Idiopathic, immune, infectious, and idiosyncratic neutropenias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance of bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy in deep sedation was strongly encouraged. Indirect anti-neutrophil antibodies detection by flow cytometry was agreed on to be the most useful and practical method for identifying the autoimmune neutropenia (AIN) [1,7,9,17,[42][43][44][45][46]. The low sensitivity (74% at first assessment) [45] of this method was recognized by the panel but it was considered, in the respect of diagnostic power, less detrimental than the lower specificity (very high number of false positives) of the direct method [44] (III, V, EO, 9, A).…”
Section: (Eo 9 A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Performance of bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy in deep sedation was strongly encouraged. Indirect anti-neutrophil antibodies detection by flow cytometry was agreed on to be the most useful and practical method for identifying the autoimmune neutropenia (AIN) [1,7,9,17,[42][43][44][45][46]. The low sensitivity (74% at first assessment) [45] of this method was recognized by the panel but it was considered, in the respect of diagnostic power, less detrimental than the lower specificity (very high number of false positives) of the direct method [44] (III, V, EO, 9, A).…”
Section: (Eo 9 A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this stage of the pathway, if no maturation block on marrow morphology is detected, and the indirect antibodies test against neutrophils are negative at least four times, the diagnosis of idiopathic neutropenia (IN) is considered appropriate [1,[7][8][9]17,46] (EO, 9,A). Since IN still remains an exclusion diagnosis the panel agreed on the need to place IN patients on a monitoring program and to perform diagnostic re-evaluation in case new elements suggestive of other diagnosis arise (EO, 9, A).…”
Section: (Eo 9 A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alemtuzumab is a humanized IgG1k monoclonal antibody that recognizes the CD52 antigen on human lymphocytes, monocytes, macrophages, eosinophils, dendritic cells and natural killer cells. Alemtuzumab causes cell lysis via complement or antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity as well as by directly acting on the T lymphocytes, which play an important role in controlling the expansion of antibody producing autoreactive B-cell clones (15). In the case of our patient, who had refractory P-AIN, Alemtuzumab was effective in maintaining stable neutrophil counts and reducing neutropenia-related hospitalizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…According to Palmblad et al, a number of patients with severe P-AIN have demonstrated transient responses to Filgrastim, corticosteroids, or antilymphocyte globulin, whereas treatment with Cyclosporine, Azathioprine and IVIG has been shown to be unsuccessful (15). Alemtuzumab is the only therapeutic agent that has been shown to induce a sustained response (2,15). Alemtuzumab is a humanized IgG1k monoclonal antibody that recognizes the CD52 antigen on human lymphocytes, monocytes, macrophages, eosinophils, dendritic cells and natural killer cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inability to detect an immune-mediated process or other obvious cause often leads to diagnosis of chronic idiopathic neutropenia (CIN) [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Similarly, secondary autoimmune neutropenia (AIN), usually associated with collagen vascular diseases, lymphoproliferative disorders and viruses, is typically diagnosed by exclusion and thus relies on the quality of clinical and laboratory workups [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Materials and Methods-using Rational Algorithms For T-cell Rmentioning
confidence: 99%