2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IEA Mobility Model (MoMo) and its use in the ETP 2008

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure A.4 shows how the modules interface with one another. By integrating assumptions on technology availability and cost in the future, the model reveals, for example, how costs could drop if technologies were deployed at a commercial scale and allows fairly detailed bottom-up "what-if" modelling, especially for passenger light-duty vehicles and trucks (Fulton et al 2009). …”
Section: Momo Comprisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure A.4 shows how the modules interface with one another. By integrating assumptions on technology availability and cost in the future, the model reveals, for example, how costs could drop if technologies were deployed at a commercial scale and allows fairly detailed bottom-up "what-if" modelling, especially for passenger light-duty vehicles and trucks (Fulton et al 2009). …”
Section: Momo Comprisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kahn Ribeiro et al (2007) note that in addition to worldwide travel studies finding a constant time budget, a rise in income has led to a shift towards faster and more energy intensive modes of transport. In discussing this, the IPCC report "Climate Fulton et al (2009). Table 1 summarises a range of models providing long term forecasts of transportation trends at a global and/or regional level.…”
Section: Section 2 -Modelling Long Term Ldvs Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developing this paper, reviews of travel patterns have been undertaken without comprehensive results for the non-OECD. The implementation of travel elasticities based on an extension of the 'travel elasticity switch' specified within Fulton et al (2009) are inappropriate for the non-OECD without improved estimates for the elasticity of travel based on per capita vehicle ownership. As a result, a future extension of this paper will focus on developing mobility scenarios appropriate for the non-OECD, the incorporation of switching between Table 2 compares the model's estimations for future mobility growth across three of the vehicle kilometre (VKM) scenarios and two models developed by the IEA.…”
Section: Section 2 -Analysis Of Travel Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with this, the report titled 'Transport Outlook 2012: Seamless Transport for Greener Growth' and produced by the OECD and ITF noted that within modelling for the period between 2010 and 2050 "passenger mobility in the OECD is dominated by light-duty vehicles (cars and light trucks), and this dominance declines only to the extent that air travel takes up a greater share of total passenger-km". (OECD/ITF (2012): 20) The IEA Mo Mo model forecasts that the 2050 level of total kilometres driven by light duty vehicles will be 1.4 times higher than the 2005 level for the OECD, 7.4 times higher for the non-OECD and 2.5 times higher at the global level (Fulton et al, 2009). As prelude to the results of this paper, a constant vehicle kilometre scenario within the WITCH model closely matches the results of the IEA Mo Mo model with the 2050 level of total kilometres being estimated at a level that is 1.5 times higher than the 2005 figure for the OECD, 7.5 times higher for the non-OECD and 2.7 times higher globally.…”
Section: Section 1 -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%