2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4896234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IETS and quantum interference: Propensity rules in the presence of an interference feature

Abstract: Destructive quantum interference in single molecule electronics is an intriguing phenomenon; however, distinguishing quantum interference effects from generically low transmission is not trivial. In this paper, we discuss how quantum interference effects in the transmission lead to either low current or a particular line shape in current-voltage curves, depending on the position of the interference feature. Second, we consider how inelastic electron tunneling spectroscopy can be used to probe the presence of a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…37). This curvature only appears if the energy of the interference in the assembled junction is close enough to E f that the feature lies almost entirely within the bias window15. The dip in transmission for PCP and AH-crystal in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…37). This curvature only appears if the energy of the interference in the assembled junction is close enough to E f that the feature lies almost entirely within the bias window15. The dip in transmission for PCP and AH-crystal in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…And although SAMs are crystalline and can be highly ordered over small areas, defects and grain boundaries can influence the current-density versus voltage ( J / V ) properties in large-area (μm 2 ) measurements14. In addition to these experimental challenges, distinguishing between destructive QI and differences in conductance arising from conjugation length require fortuitous level-alignment in the assembled junction15. Through-space QI is potentially useful beyond validating theoretical predictions as it could couple small structural or conformational changes (for example, from external mechanical forces) into exponential changes in conductance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for the case of molecules strongly coupled to the leads, such as in the quantum interference regime, IETS remains a better spectroscopic tool [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Recent theoretical works have calculated the inelastic contributions to the current in the presence of QI [28] and have explored propensity rules that can play a role in this case [29,30]. QI is not completely quenched by the decoherence due to the inelastic interaction of electrons with molecular vibrational modes; furthermore, the inelastic contributions to the current in the presence of QI is predicted to be larger than in molecules without interference meaning that QI can be exploited to investigate vibrational mode signatures on electronic transport.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the IETS signal for molecular vibrations that are not directly involved in the electron-transport pathways can undergo mode suppression, such phenomena are also likely to occur as a result of quantum interference effects. According to a recent study made by Lykkebo et al [58], the non-overlapping of transmission channels stemming from quantum interference within the molecular motif may cause suppression of the corresponding vibrational modes. Metal centers in single-molecule junctions may thus have diverse yet discernible impact on the inelastic transmission whose resonant peaks or dips are often determined by the relative values of elastic and inelastic contributions to the net current near the phonon excitation threshold.…”
Section: Fano Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the localized state, as assisted by phonons through either emission or absorption, gives rise to an indirect pathway. Once these two transport pathways interfere at the band continuum provided by the semi-infinite quasi-1D electrodes, it results in the resonant suppression of the electronic transmission leading to the destructive QI, while the peaks may occur due to the constructive QI at their respective phonon excitation thresholds [58,68,69,70,71,72]. In the HOMO dominated transport junctions such as a-CrCrCr and s-CoCoRu (see Figures 6a and 6c), an incoming electron from the left electrode tunnels inelastically through a delocalized state near the renormalized HOMO by absorbing a phonon of certain energy (Ω 1 or Ω 3 ) to reach the right electrode.…”
Section: Fano Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%