2019
DOI: 10.1080/13613324.2019.1679754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ignoring race: a comparative analysis of education policy in British Columbia and Ontario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the politics of anti-racist resistance, race, racialization, and anti-racism are central to notions of reform (Abawi, 2018;Carr, 1999Carr, , 2008Davidson, 2009;Dei & Karumanchery, 1999;James & Turner, 2017;Logan, 2018). These studies highlight myths, contradictions, and inconsistencies in critical equity CJEAP, 198 discourses and policies (Abawi & Brady, 2017;Carr, 1999;Joshee, 2007;McCaskell, 2005;Skerrett, 2008;Wilson, 2020), symbolic enactments of equity policies (Cherubini & Hodson, 2008;George et al, 2020), and the invisibility and erasure of anti-Indigeneity, anti-Black racism, and other forms of racism in discourses of equity and social justice (Cherubini & Hodson, 2008;Rezai-Rashti et al, 2015). As such, studies promote the deconstruction and dismantling of programs, structures, and practices that perpetuate disproportionate and disparate outcomes and experiences for Black, Indigenous, and racialized youth (Cherubini & Hodson, 2008;Gaztambide-Fernandez & Parekh, 2017).…”
Section: Politics Of Anti-racist Resistancementioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the politics of anti-racist resistance, race, racialization, and anti-racism are central to notions of reform (Abawi, 2018;Carr, 1999Carr, , 2008Davidson, 2009;Dei & Karumanchery, 1999;James & Turner, 2017;Logan, 2018). These studies highlight myths, contradictions, and inconsistencies in critical equity CJEAP, 198 discourses and policies (Abawi & Brady, 2017;Carr, 1999;Joshee, 2007;McCaskell, 2005;Skerrett, 2008;Wilson, 2020), symbolic enactments of equity policies (Cherubini & Hodson, 2008;George et al, 2020), and the invisibility and erasure of anti-Indigeneity, anti-Black racism, and other forms of racism in discourses of equity and social justice (Cherubini & Hodson, 2008;Rezai-Rashti et al, 2015). As such, studies promote the deconstruction and dismantling of programs, structures, and practices that perpetuate disproportionate and disparate outcomes and experiences for Black, Indigenous, and racialized youth (Cherubini & Hodson, 2008;Gaztambide-Fernandez & Parekh, 2017).…”
Section: Politics Of Anti-racist Resistancementioning
confidence: 91%
“…The motivation to collect race-based data in sectors such as education is to metricize relative differences in the impact of barriers to representation and success between various racialized groups particularly those who are disproportionately impacted by white colonialism in North America (George et al, 2019 ). For example, within the K-12 educational space, the TDSB implemented a Student and Parent Census where data is disaggregated by several demographic characteristics including race, allowing it to produce several ethno-racial sub-reports.…”
Section: Race-based Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite calls to recognize the various cultural worldviews of racialized individuals, Canada continues to adhere to a colorblind approach in its justice system. Canadian researchers are increasingly admonishing leaders within various social systems, such as in education (George, Maier, and Robson 2020) and children's services (Adjei et al 2018), to acknowledge racialized considerations rather than continue to advance colorblind policies within their institutions. However, as noted by Reasons et al (2016), Canadian-specific research around this issue is limited, often overshadowed by Canada's seemingly inclusive multicultural policy (Fleras 2017).…”
Section: Race and Crime In The Canadian Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%