1980
DOI: 10.1080/00288233.1980.10417860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

II. Nitrogen fertiliser: Effect on incidence, and possible mode of action

Abstract: Application of urea at rates from 56 to 256 kg/ha either in spring or at ear emergence to ryegrass plots where blind seed inoculum (apothecia of Gloeotinia temulenta (Prill. and Del.) Wilson, Noble and Gray) was present significantly reduced blind seed infection and correspondingly increased germination of harvested seed in trials in 1972and 1978.In the 1978 trial, sulphate of ammonia at 56 and 112 kg/ha reduced the amount of blind seed, but not significantly. In laboratory and pot testing, urea directly suppr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A reduction in blind seed infection as nitrogen application rates increase has been previously reported (Hampton & Scott 1980, 1981. In 1985, splitting the N application in the spring reduced the control offered by the urea, but whether this was because of application after spikelet initiation (Hampton & Scott 1981) or because the rate applied at spikelet initiation was correspondingly reduced, i.e., 33 or 50 g m-2 instead of 100 g m-2 , could not be determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A reduction in blind seed infection as nitrogen application rates increase has been previously reported (Hampton & Scott 1980, 1981. In 1985, splitting the N application in the spring reduced the control offered by the urea, but whether this was because of application after spikelet initiation (Hampton & Scott 1981) or because the rate applied at spikelet initiation was correspondingly reduced, i.e., 33 or 50 g m-2 instead of 100 g m-2 , could not be determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In 1985, splitting the N application in the spring reduced the control offered by the urea, but whether this was because of application after spikelet initiation (Hampton & Scott 1981) or because the rate applied at spikelet initiation was correspondingly reduced, i.e., 33 or 50 g m-2 instead of 100 g m-2 , could not be determined. How urea reduces blind seed infection (Hampton & Scott 1980) in L. perenne remains to be determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%