2013
DOI: 10.23863/kalem.2017.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmen Adaylarının Uzamsal Görselleştirme Becerilerinin SOLO Modeli ile İncelenmesi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This situation creates some inconsistencies in the answers of the multi-structural level. As a matter of fact, in the study by Göktepe and Özdemir (2013) examining the spatial visualization skills of pre-service mathematics teachers with the SOLO model, it was found that the preservice teachers were predominantly at a very structural level. In addition, in the aforementioned study, it was stated that preservice teachers could use data in their answers, but their inability to grasp the relationship between data caused some deficiencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This situation creates some inconsistencies in the answers of the multi-structural level. As a matter of fact, in the study by Göktepe and Özdemir (2013) examining the spatial visualization skills of pre-service mathematics teachers with the SOLO model, it was found that the preservice teachers were predominantly at a very structural level. In addition, in the aforementioned study, it was stated that preservice teachers could use data in their answers, but their inability to grasp the relationship between data caused some deficiencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the literature is examined, it is seen that the studies on geometry using the SOLO taxonomy are related to spatial (Göktepe, 2013;Göktepe & Özdemir, 2013;Köse, 2018;Özdemir & Göktepe-Yıldız, 2015) or two-dimensional plane (Konyalıhatipoğlu, 2016). However, in the literature review, it was observed that there was no study investigating the geometric thinking levels of preservice teachers regarding real-life problem situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the results of the study are examined, it can be said that 29 attainments related to the first sub-problem are from superficial learning that includes uni-structural and multi-structural levels, while 31 are from the deep learning that consists of relational and extended abstract levels. In studies related to the SOLO taxonomy, it is generally observed that the one-structural/multistructural thinking structure is more involved than the relational and extended abstract thinking structure (Celik, 2007;Goktepe & Ozdemir, 2013;Lian & Idris, 2006). As for this study, it was determined that the attainments related to the relational and extended abstract level of thinking are more than others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Örüntü etkinlikleri sayesinde öğrenciler, cebirsel etkinliklere dahil olur ve cebiri öğrenirler, fonsiyonel düşünmeleri gelişir ve genelleme yapabilirler (Souviney, 1994;Van De Walle, 2004;Warren ve Cooper, 2006). Örüntülerle çalışmanın sayılar, geometri, ölçme ve veri konuları ile yakından ilişkili olup (Fox, 2005), uzamsal yetenekler ile de ilgili olduğu belirtilmektedir (Göktepe ve Özdemir, 2013). Örüntüler, aritmetik ve geometrik dizi problemlerinde ve günlük yaşam durumlarında, sözlü ve yazılı kelimelerde, müzik yapılarında ve video görsellerinde, doğal geometride, trafikte ve bizlerin oluşturduğu diğer nesnelerde karşımıza çıkmaktadırlar (Reys, Suydam, Lindquist ve Smith,1998).…”
Section: Uzun öZ Girişunclassified
“…Fox (2005) asserted that studying patterns is closely connected to mathematical content areas such as numbers, geometry, measurement, and data. Moreover, Göktepe and Özdemir (2013) indicated that pattern is related to spatial reasoning skills. Patterns are found in arithmetic and geometric sequences problems, as well as in various real situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%