Illegitimate trade in the fashion industry: relevance and counterstrategies in the Italian context

Abstract

Purpose From a supply chain perspective, counterfeiting is only part of a wider phenomenon defined as “illegitimate trade,” which includes supply chain infiltrations, factory overruns, gray and parallel markets, retail service counterfeiting and shoplifting. Although different forms of illegitimate trade can be observed, companies address them mainly through legal action, overlooking other counterstrategies such as technology adoption, supply chain integration and communication campaigns. This paper aims to understand which illegitimate trade phenomena are the most common and damaging to high-end fashion firms, identifying the counterstrategies that companies leverage the most and assessing the effectiveness of the counterstrategies. Design/methodology/approach A survey was conducted to address the above-mentioned research goals. It was targeted at Italian high-end fashion companies and 112 usable questionnaires were collected. Findings Empirical evidence shows that the most common illegitimate trade events are pure counterfeiting and parallel/gray markets. Various forms of illegitimate trade can co-exist and are correlated, but each of them calls for a targeted bundle of countering strategies. A synergic relationship among strategies is also observed. Originality/value This paper addresses the issue of counterfeiting and illegitimate trade with a holistic approach, highlighting the necessity of an interfunctional approach within the company as a condition for effectively countering these problems.

Wildlife trafficking as a societal supply chain risk: Removing the parasite without damaging the host?

“…Previous research in the supply chain security literature has emphasized the challenges for customs in facilitating legitimate trade while deterring illicit trade (Basu, 2013, 2019) and has also highlighted structural and operational supply chain features that enable illicit trade (Basu, 2013, 2014; Shelley, 2018; Wyatt et al, 2018). To date, SCM research has investigated illegal activities in legal supply chains in the context of food supply chains (Smith & McElwee, 2021), conflict minerals (Hofmann et al, 2018), and modern slavery and human trafficking (Gold et al, 2015), and it has also linked illegal activities to supply chain vulnerability and resilience (Pettit et al, 2013; Wagner & Bode, 2006), supply chain security (Yang & Wei, 2013), and counterfeiting (D'Amato et al, 2019; Yi et al, 2020).…”

“…Third, we extend the SCI literature by empirically elaborating on WLT as an example of SCI. To date, the SCM literature has primarily investigated undesirable or illegal activities in supply chains, but apart from some noteworthy exceptions (D'Amato et al, 2019; D'Amato & Papadimitriou, 2013), a systematic introduction of the topic is still lacking in the SCM discourse. Moreover, SCI has foremost been discussed in counterfeiting contexts (e.g., Ghamat et al, 2021; Yi et al, 2020) and has not yet been linked to WLT.…”

Combating deceptive counterfeiting in digital supply chain

“…A survey was carried out on high-end fashion companies in Italy by D ' Amato et al (2019). Through this survey, they studied the types of illegitimate trade to find the most damaging trade to the high-end fashion firms.…”

Luxury supply chain management: a framework proposal based on a systematic literature review

“…the accessible luxury supply chain. Some conventional mechanisms are recommended for supporting traceability strategies, such as adopting a registered trademark, promoting continuous awareness among partners, taking legal action against those who practice illegal commerce and investing in technology (Brun et al, 2013a;Khan, 2015;Quach and Thaichon, 2018;D'Amato et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2020). Technology has been used as an instrument to reduce traceability costs and provide adequate monitoring.…”