2019
DOI: 10.1017/glj.2019.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Illiberal Constitutionalism: The Case of Hungary and Poland

Abstract: This Article argues that, as far as Hungary and Poland are concerned, the use of term “illiberal constitutionalism” is justified. It also claims that, without denying that other states could also be considered illiberal democracies, Hungary and Poland display unique and distinctive features. These features include populist politics, which lead to the relativization of the rule of law and democracy principles, and human rights protection, which captured the constitution and constitutionalism by constitutionaliz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Both states have similar post-communist legacies, and their paradigmatically populist governments support each other and borrow each other's ideas and strategies for gaining power and executing authority (Sata and Karolewski 2020). Right-wing populists governing in both countries ground their political philosophy on the rejection of liberalism, practice illiberal constitutionalism and (despite several superficial differences), pursue a highly comparable foreign policy (Drinóczi and Bień-Kacała 2019;Varga and Buzogány 2021). Another common feature is that neither Law and Justice nor Fidesz initially represented the radical right wing populist cases in their origins.…”
Section: Theoretical and Methodological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both states have similar post-communist legacies, and their paradigmatically populist governments support each other and borrow each other's ideas and strategies for gaining power and executing authority (Sata and Karolewski 2020). Right-wing populists governing in both countries ground their political philosophy on the rejection of liberalism, practice illiberal constitutionalism and (despite several superficial differences), pursue a highly comparable foreign policy (Drinóczi and Bień-Kacała 2019;Varga and Buzogány 2021). Another common feature is that neither Law and Justice nor Fidesz initially represented the radical right wing populist cases in their origins.…”
Section: Theoretical and Methodological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process, similar to changes introduced in Hungary after 2010 (Drinóczi & Bień-Kacała, 2019;Holesch & Kyriazi, 2021), is more than the sum of its parts. Considering the legal amendments, personnel changes, and changes in roles assigned and performed by institutions, it aims to reconstruct Poland's constitutional model without formally changing the Constitution of 2 April 1997.…”
Section: The Rule Of Law Backsliding In Polandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…] for the accession to the European Union of any European State applying to become an EU member", 716 one would expect that to be the end of the 711 European Council in Copenhagen, Conclusions of the Presidency of 21-22 June 1993, p. 13, also mentioning "respect for and protection of minorities". 712 In analysing 'illiberal constitutionalism', Drinóczi and Bień-Kacała (2019), p. 1140 have also referred to "the relativization of the rule of law and democracy principles, and human rights protection". 713 Obwexer (2020), paras 62 and 80; Hilf and Schorkopf (2021), para 18.…”
Section: The Internal Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%