2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-33362-1_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Illicit Drug Markets Today

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Maintaining a reputation as someone, who was not interested in being involved in criminal activities, is a self-protective strategy that was widely respected among our participants’ criminal friends. Contrary to studies that show how gang-related young people sometimes groom peers to become involved in the drug trade (see McLean et al, 2019), findings from our study suggest that many of our participants felt that their gang-related friends were very considerate about not involving their law-abiding friends.…”
Section: Abstaining From Crime While Keeping In Contact With Crime-in...contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Maintaining a reputation as someone, who was not interested in being involved in criminal activities, is a self-protective strategy that was widely respected among our participants’ criminal friends. Contrary to studies that show how gang-related young people sometimes groom peers to become involved in the drug trade (see McLean et al, 2019), findings from our study suggest that many of our participants felt that their gang-related friends were very considerate about not involving their law-abiding friends.…”
Section: Abstaining From Crime While Keeping In Contact With Crime-in...contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…One aspect of this theme of peer pressure and criminal involvement has been emphasized more recently by researchers in the United Kingdom, who have highlighted the ways in which marginalized young men’s pathways into drug crimes are sometimes the result of criminal exploitation, where older and more criminally experienced individuals groom or force their less experienced peers into drug selling in order to profit from their criminal labor (Harding, 2020; McLean et al, 2019; Moyle, 2019). This theme has also been noted in research in Denmark (the empirical focus of this article), albeit to a lesser extent (Søgaard et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significantly, if the objective (for some) of their involvement in professional harm-reduction work, research or campaigning on the issue of 'county lines' is to rescue or 'empower' disenfranchised youth, then the conversation needs to move beyond these limited, and limiting, categorisations. Rooting the county lines discourse in simplistic and binary categorisations of victim and perpetrator not only draws clear lines where many have already observed they cannot be drawn, 100 it works to (purposefully) depoliticise and mask a long-standing and persistent 'crimes' production agenda that harms racially marginalised groups and communities, and to de-contextualise the lived realities of those who are subject to it (a persistent imperialist humanitarian trope. 101 In foregrounding the political trajectory of the county lines 'category' by re-historicising and re-politicising it, we create the conditions in which the political agency of those subject to it can be asserted, opening a space in which narratives and practices of resistance can surface.…”
Section: Conclusion: County Lines Racism and The British Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, in light of the evolving nature of harms and risks for this specific group of young people, including the increase in (and/or increased understanding of) extra-familial harm, these types of harms very much extend beyond 18. Harm may continue irrespective of whether a young person enters or leaves care and harm from exploitation can arguably fuel a cycle of victim/perpetrator more than many other type of abuse (Home Office, 2019; Cockbain and Olver, 2019; McLean et al , 2020). This presents new challenges to child protection and adult safeguarding (Senker et al , 2020; Turner et al , 2019).…”
Section: Legal Differences Between Children and Adult Safeguardingmentioning
confidence: 99%