1993
DOI: 10.1068/p220391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Illusion Decrement and Transfer of Illusion Decrement in Müller-Lyer Figures

Abstract: In the work reported in the literature the reduction or decrement in the magnitude of the Müller-Lyer illusion with continued inspection has been typically investigated with the use of the composite illusion form. Three experiments are reported in which the illusion decrement was separately examined in the underestimated (wings-in) and the overestimated (wings-out) forms of the Müller-Lyer illusion, with particular attention paid to the transfer of illusion decrement between the two forms. Decrement occurred i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, the measurement-task hypothesis is invalidated if with this method decrement is found with the continuous-but not the intermittent-inspection procedure. The wings-in M-L illusion was not investigated since studies have either measured a small decrement effect (Predebon, Stevens, & Petocz, 1993), no decrement (Porac, 1994) or a puzzling pattern of illusion increment (increase) in the initial trials followed by illusion decrement in the later trials (Sarris, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obviously, the measurement-task hypothesis is invalidated if with this method decrement is found with the continuous-but not the intermittent-inspection procedure. The wings-in M-L illusion was not investigated since studies have either measured a small decrement effect (Predebon, Stevens, & Petocz, 1993), no decrement (Porac, 1994) or a puzzling pattern of illusion increment (increase) in the initial trials followed by illusion decrement in the later trials (Sarris, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested (e.g., Predebon et al, 1993;Predebon, 1998; see also Lewis, 1908) that attentional set may promote the occurrence of illusion decrement, independently of other decrement-inducing factors. In particular, it seems plausible to assume that, at least in certain situations, observers learn during the course of a decrement session to switch from a 'whole' to a 'part-isolating' attitude (Predebon et al, 1993; see also Lewis, 1908). The continuous-inspection paradigm, by requiring observers to scan the test component (i.e., the M-L shaft or the oblique lines of the Poggendorff figure), is likely to facilitate a 'part-isolating' attitude and hence illusion decrement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…integrierende neuronale Netze des Hirnstamms[1]) und die adaptive Modifikation (Vermis[14] bzw. Flokkulus[24] des Zerebellums) der Puls-und Step-Komponente jeweils in verschiedenen zerebralen Strukturen erfolgt, sind sowohl unterschiedliche retinotopische und extraretinotopische Einflüsse als auch von der Orientierung der Müller-Lyer-Figuren abhängige Einflüsse auf die postsakkadische Drift möglich.Eine Adaptation der wahrgenommenen Längenunterschiede tritt in den ersten 1 -2 Minuten einer kontinuierlichen Inspektion von Müller-Lyer-Figuren auf[16]. Eine adaptive Anpassung der Sakkadenamplitude wird dann ausgelöst, wenn bei aufeinander folgenden Sakkaden die Endposition des Auges systematisch vom Sakkadenziel abweicht[21].…”
unclassified