Nuclear Cardiac Imaging 2015
DOI: 10.1093/med/9780199392094.003.0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image Artifacts

Abstract: Artifacts and normal variants are a significant source of false-positive interpretations of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). This chapter discusses how, by anticipating and recognizing such findings, the astute technologist and interpreting physician can increase test specificity in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease and avoid unnecessary catheterization of normal patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example would be the basal myocardial septal region that consists of membranous tissue rather than muscle that in some individuals has a longer length. 74 The result can be an apparent perfusion defect in the basal septum, but with experience, the finding is usually recognized as normal variant anatomy, often by examining the basal septum in the horizontal long-axis view, noting that the septal wall is shorter than the lateral wall but normal with smooth, curved contour at the base. Nevertheless, there are circumstances in which the defect can be real.…”
Section: Normal Anatomy Vs True Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example would be the basal myocardial septal region that consists of membranous tissue rather than muscle that in some individuals has a longer length. 74 The result can be an apparent perfusion defect in the basal septum, but with experience, the finding is usually recognized as normal variant anatomy, often by examining the basal septum in the horizontal long-axis view, noting that the septal wall is shorter than the lateral wall but normal with smooth, curved contour at the base. Nevertheless, there are circumstances in which the defect can be real.…”
Section: Normal Anatomy Vs True Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%