2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67543-5_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image-Based Smoke Detection in Laparoscopic Videos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accuracy F1-Score RGB 0.60 0.60 IMSHARP 0.58 0.58 BF [40] 0.60 0.59 GF [14] 0.60 0.59 WLS [12] 0 Comparison with the saturation histogram based classification methodologies. We compare FC AVG with the saturation histogram based classification methodologies Saturation Analysis (SAN) and Saturation Peak Analysis (SPA) [9,30]. SAN and SPA codes are provided by [9,30] 6 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Accuracy F1-Score RGB 0.60 0.60 IMSHARP 0.58 0.58 BF [40] 0.60 0.59 GF [14] 0.60 0.59 WLS [12] 0 Comparison with the saturation histogram based classification methodologies. We compare FC AVG with the saturation histogram based classification methodologies Saturation Analysis (SAN) and Saturation Peak Analysis (SPA) [9,30]. SAN and SPA codes are provided by [9,30] 6 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of their CNN models on Cholec80 [36] dataset are very similar to that of SAN or SPA. While DL shows its promising performance on smoke classification [9,30], to the best of our knowledge there is no work that does image enhancement for smoke classification. Therefore, we limit to comparisons with the non deep learning based methods only in our experimental section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations