2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-022-10305-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image denoising in the deep learning era

Abstract: Over the last decade, the number of digital images captured per day witnessed a massive explosion. Nevertheless, the visual quality of photographs is often degraded by noise during image acquisition or transmission. With the re-emergence of deep neural networks, the performance of image denoising techniques has been substantially improved in recent years. The objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive survey of recent advances in image denoising techniques based on deep neural networks. In doing so,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 235 publications
(336 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More automated tools learn optimal segmentation on single focal strains, and permit user control on visual output or statistics from the identified cells (Meacock, et al, 2021;Padovani, et al, 2022;Stylianidou, et al, 2016). Other approaches attempt to limit user investment by training on large data sets of case images, optimising aspects of e.g., cell segmentation (Cutler, et al, 2022;Panigrahi, et al, 2021;Stringer, et al, 2021), denoising (Chen, et al, 2018;Izadi, et al, 2023;Liu, et al, 2018;Zhang, et al, 2017), or cell tracking (Hayashida and Bise, 2019;He, et al, 2017;Lugagne, et al, 2020). Tools such as Trackmate 7, aim to provide plug-ins to enable optimal transfer segmentation results to subsequent tracking tools (Ershov, et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More automated tools learn optimal segmentation on single focal strains, and permit user control on visual output or statistics from the identified cells (Meacock, et al, 2021;Padovani, et al, 2022;Stylianidou, et al, 2016). Other approaches attempt to limit user investment by training on large data sets of case images, optimising aspects of e.g., cell segmentation (Cutler, et al, 2022;Panigrahi, et al, 2021;Stringer, et al, 2021), denoising (Chen, et al, 2018;Izadi, et al, 2023;Liu, et al, 2018;Zhang, et al, 2017), or cell tracking (Hayashida and Bise, 2019;He, et al, 2017;Lugagne, et al, 2020). Tools such as Trackmate 7, aim to provide plug-ins to enable optimal transfer segmentation results to subsequent tracking tools (Ershov, et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article proposes an accurate and real-time tidal bore recognition algorithm, involving edge detection algorithms, 13,14 the image segmentation algorithm [15][16][17] and the edge connection algorithm 18,19 can accurately identify the tidal bore headlines under complex river conditions. At the same time, a real-time automatic tracking algorithm for tidal bore by UAV has been proposed, which can control UAV to track tidal bore on specified routes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, during the last decades, multiple Deep Learning models have found a successful place in the denoising task for various noisy images. An overview about this can be seen in Elad et al's [7] work and Izadi et al's [8] work. In a recent investigation, Damikoukas and Lagaros [9] explored the feasibility of utilizing an ML model as a robust tool to predict building earthquake responses, addressing the shortcomings of simplified models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%