Image-Guided Biopsy/Liquid Biopsy

Roberts, Rene; Siddiqui, Bilal A.; Subudhi, Sumit K.; Sheth, Rahul A.

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48767-6_18

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the radiation exposure of CTs, the limited available space, and the long image acquisition times of MRIs often impede elementary biopsies. Interventional ultrasound (US) imaging provides more flexible image guidance, despite lower resolution ( Roberts et al, 2020 ). Facing these constraints, robotic systems can improve the efficiency and outcome of percutaneous interventions while lowering the burden for the patient.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design and validation of a medical robotic device system to control two collaborative robots for ultrasound-guided needle insertions

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The percutaneous biopsy is a critical intervention for diagnosis and staging in cancer therapy. Robotic systems can improve the efficiency and outcome of such procedures while alleviating stress for physicians and patients. However, the high complexity of operation and the limited possibilities for robotic integration in the operating room (OR) decrease user acceptance and the number of deployed robots. Collaborative systems and standardized device communication may provide approaches to overcome named problems. Derived from the IEEE 11073 SDC standard terminology of medical device systems, we designed and validated a medical robotic device system (MERODES) to access and control a collaborative setup of two KUKA robots for ultrasound-guided needle insertions. The system is based on a novel standard for service-oriented device connectivity and utilizes collaborative principles to enhance user experience. Implementing separated workflow applications allows for a flexible system setup and configuration. The system was validated in three separate test scenarios to measure accuracies for 1) co-registration, 2) needle target planning in a water bath and 3) in an abdominal phantom. The co-registration accuracy averaged 0.94 ± 0.42 mm. The positioning errors ranged from 0.86 ± 0.42 to 1.19 ± 0.70 mm in the water bath setup and from 1.69 ± 0.92 to 1.96 ± 0.86 mm in the phantom. The presented results serve as a proof-of-concept and add to the current state of the art to alleviate system deployment and fast configuration for percutaneous robotic interventions.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%