2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image-guided interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally recurrent uterine cervical cancer: A single-institution study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
50
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the patient population receiving previous radiotherapy, we observed fairly impressive local control with SM-ISBT as salvage. Our 2-year actuarial local control rate of 50% is close to some previous studies that have reported a range of 44e53% [16,19,22]. At 3 years, Yoshida et al [27] reported a local control rate of 75% for patients with cervical cancer who had initial radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy, and 46% for patients who had initial definitive radiation, and explained the difference with the lower initial radiation dose for patients who received adjuvant radiation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the patient population receiving previous radiotherapy, we observed fairly impressive local control with SM-ISBT as salvage. Our 2-year actuarial local control rate of 50% is close to some previous studies that have reported a range of 44e53% [16,19,22]. At 3 years, Yoshida et al [27] reported a local control rate of 75% for patients with cervical cancer who had initial radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy, and 46% for patients who had initial definitive radiation, and explained the difference with the lower initial radiation dose for patients who received adjuvant radiation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The 3year local control rate was 71% in patients with previous radiation in the study by Kamran et al [20]. This study reports an overall survival rate of 78% at 2 years but only 38% at 3 years, which is initially higher than previously reported 2-year overall survival rates of 52.5, 67, 52 and 61% [16,19,22,25], but lower than the reported 3year overall survival rate of 54% by Kamran et al [20]. This might be due to inherent limitations in our study, including heterogeneity in patient inclusion and selection bias, as well as a median follow-up of just 2 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Accordingly, a phase III prospective clinical trial by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to determine whether ICBT boost after EBRT improves clinical outcomes in NPC patients has failed to show its efficacy, supposedly because of inadequate irradiation dose coverage of the lateral tumor extension with ICBT [ 22 ]. Cumulative knowledge of interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) in other anatomical sites [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ] proved that if the thickness of the tumor is larger than 5 mm, it is unreachable with conventional ICBT, and if interstitial needle application is possible, a boost with HDR-ISBT would be a better option to escalate local dose, while minimizing unnecessary irradiation to surrounding normal tissues [ 26 , 27 , 28 ]. A group from the Thomas Jefferson University reported the usefulness of salvage surgery combined with re-irradiation with intraoperative 131 Cs permanent brachytherapy implant in recurrent head and neck cancer [ 48 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that interstitial brachytherapy is highly effective for locally advanced gynecologic cancers, with a 2-year locoregional control ranging from 51.3% to 93% [11,12]. Another study found that ISBT had similar overall survival and local control when compared to intracavitary brachytherapy despite the ISBT group including patients with larger tumors [13].…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%