2017 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icme.2017.8019431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image quality assessment for free viewpoint video based on mid-level contours feature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the fact that (1) content related trajectory is able to stress the system; (2) content is related to structure; (3) geometric distortions are the most annoying degradations that interrupt structure introduced by view synthesis, the main idea of the proposed method is to assess the quality of the navigation videos by quantifying to what extent the classes of contours change due to view synthesis, compression and transition among views. It is an extended version of our previous work [54] (a quality measure for image) to cope with the FVV scenario. In this version, the complex registration stage is replaced by local regions selection, and a ST-based temporal estimator is incorporated to quantify temporal artifacts.…”
Section: Video Quality Measure For Free Viewpoint Videosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the fact that (1) content related trajectory is able to stress the system; (2) content is related to structure; (3) geometric distortions are the most annoying degradations that interrupt structure introduced by view synthesis, the main idea of the proposed method is to assess the quality of the navigation videos by quantifying to what extent the classes of contours change due to view synthesis, compression and transition among views. It is an extended version of our previous work [54] (a quality measure for image) to cope with the FVV scenario. In this version, the complex registration stage is replaced by local regions selection, and a ST-based temporal estimator is incorporated to quantify temporal artifacts.…”
Section: Video Quality Measure For Free Viewpoint Videosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher semantic and efficient representation of low-level structural elements, i.e., mid-level representation is thus defined, which are the categories of the contours. Based on this assumption, a Sketch-Token based Image Quality Metric (ST-IQM) by checking how the categories of contours change due to structural distortions [22] is employed as the mid-level structure representation based estimator in our study (also employed in [23] as mid-level descriptor), where contours are first 'encoded' as a vector f ST of contour categories likelihood values. The mid-level estimator is calculated as the Minkowski summation of the errors computed based on the mid-level descriptor across the entire image:…”
Section: Mid-level Structure Representation Based Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall performance results are shown in [7] 0.6864 0.4842 0.6125 MP-PSNRr [10] 0.6954 0.4784 0.6606 MW-PSNRr [10] 0.6637 0.4921 0.6293 CT-IQM [11] 0.6809 0.6626 0.4877 BF-M [1] 0.6980 0.5885 0.4768 EM-IQM [12] 0.7430 0.6726 0.4455 ST-IQM [22] 0.8217 0.7710 0.3929 LoGs [13] 0.8256 0.7812 0.3601 Proposed 0.9023 0.8448 0.2870 NO Reference Metric (NR) NIQSV [14] 0.6346 0.5146 0.6167 NIQSV+ [15] 0.7114 0.4679 0.6668 APT [16] 0.7307 0.7140 0.4622 CSC-NRM [25] 0.8302 0.7827 0.3233…”
Section: Overall Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Silva et al [25] proposed a learning based Stereoscopic Structural Distortion (StSD) metric to evaluate the quality of 3D videos. The quality assessment algorithm proposed in [35] estimates the quality of the synthesized image by measuring how classes of image contours change due to synthesis process. The no-reference synthesized image quality metric proposed in [36] exploits simple morphological operators to predict the quality of the virtual image.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described earlier, in evaluating the quality of synthesized images the proposed 3D-IQA metric does not require the corresponding reference images hence, it is not a full-reference IQA metric. For performance evaluation, we compared SIQM with the widely used 3D-IQA metrics: 3DSwIM [34], You l (local model) [32], You g (global model) [32], StSD [25], Benoit [37], Gorley [29], ST-SIAQ [35], and NIQSV [36]. In this set of compared methods, NIQSV is a no-reference technique while the rest are full-reference quality metrics.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%