2012
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2011.166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image Restoration by Matching Gradient Distributions

Abstract: Abstract-The restoration of a blurry or noisy image is commonly performed with a MAP estimator, which maximizes a posterior probability to reconstruct a clean image from a degraded image. A MAP estimator, when used with a sparse gradient image prior, reconstructs piecewise smooth images and typically removes textures that are important for visual realism. We present an alternative deconvolution method called iterative distribution reweighting (IDR) which imposes a global constraint on gradients so that a recon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A highly sparse (concave) prior can ultimately be more effective in differentiating sharp images and fine structures than a convex one. Detailed supported evidence for this claim can be found in [1], [29], [30], [31]. However, if such a prior is applied at the initial stages of estimation, the iterations are likely to become trapped at suboptimal local minima, of which there will always be a combinatorial number.…”
Section: A the Effective Penalty On Xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A highly sparse (concave) prior can ultimately be more effective in differentiating sharp images and fine structures than a convex one. Detailed supported evidence for this claim can be found in [1], [29], [30], [31]. However, if such a prior is applied at the initial stages of estimation, the iterations are likely to become trapped at suboptimal local minima, of which there will always be a combinatorial number.…”
Section: A the Effective Penalty On Xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the type of image and type of noise with which it is corrupted, a slight change in individual method or combination of any methods further improves visual quality. In this survey, we focus on survey the existing techniques of image enhancement, which can be classified into two broad categories as spatial domain enhancement and Frequency domain based enhancement [2]. N.Mohanapriya and B. Kalaavati presented spatial domain Denoising techniques along with their algorithm and also analyzes their performance based on the image quality for medical images [3].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the image restoration literature degradation often assumed to be an AWGN. A widely used estimation techniques are based on the mean absolute deviation [14].In [15] quantitative measures are estimated for each intensity in spatial domain. A Stefano and P. Whites, system was based training samples in other domain only for natural images [16].Generalization expectation maximization restoration techniques in any domain developed and estimate the spectral features.…”
Section: Quality Measures and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%