2003
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.121.3.391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging a Child's Fundus Without Dilation Using a Handheld Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Advantages of the handheld nonmydriatic SLO device included high tolerability, feasibility in children with poor fixation, and portability; however, there were several disadvantages, including inability to produce color images and long acquisition times (up to 15 minutes). The SLO device used was also only a prototype device that is not commercially available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Advantages of the handheld nonmydriatic SLO device included high tolerability, feasibility in children with poor fixation, and portability; however, there were several disadvantages, including inability to produce color images and long acquisition times (up to 15 minutes). The SLO device used was also only a prototype device that is not commercially available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widely used SLO produced by Rodenstock, Germany is no longer commercially available. However, SLO models with comparable capabilities are described by Kelly et al (2003) and Sharp et al (2004).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Central Scotomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, integrating wavefront sensing and correcting AO components into SLO results in systems too large and heavy for handheld use. As a compromise, handheld SLO (without AO) was first demonstrated by Kelly et al [17] and was found to be helpful in imaging children with nystagmus, photophobia, eccentric fixation, cone dystrophy, and mild papilledema. However, due to low resolution, this system was unable to visualize individual photoreceptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%