2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging and observing the electrical Moho

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During initial inversion steps, four tear zones were applied to maintain separation of the model into upper (0–10 km), intermediate (10–24km), and lower crust (24–31.5km) as well as the mantle (≥31.5km) (Note, a tear zone is where changes in conductivity across the boundary do not contribute to the summed roughness measure so can be as discontinuous in conductivity as required to best fit the data. An example is shown for 1‐D in Jones [] where a tear zone was permitted at the Moho, analogous to what we are doing here);…”
Section: Inversionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During initial inversion steps, four tear zones were applied to maintain separation of the model into upper (0–10 km), intermediate (10–24km), and lower crust (24–31.5km) as well as the mantle (≥31.5km) (Note, a tear zone is where changes in conductivity across the boundary do not contribute to the summed roughness measure so can be as discontinuous in conductivity as required to best fit the data. An example is shown for 1‐D in Jones [] where a tear zone was permitted at the Moho, analogous to what we are doing here);…”
Section: Inversionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The subsequent steps that were followed were as follows: During initial inversion steps, four tear zones were applied to maintain separation of the model into upper (0–10 km), intermediate (10–24km), and lower crust (24–31.5km) as well as the mantle (≥31.5km) (Note, a tear zone is where changes in conductivity across the boundary do not contribute to the summed roughness measure so can be as discontinuous in conductivity as required to best fit the data. An example is shown for 1‐D in Jones [] where a tear zone was permitted at the Moho, analogous to what we are doing here); Features were manually removed or their resistivity values were modified in order to test whether they became reestablished in subsequent inversion steps and could therefore be considered data‐supported structures; Focused inversions were carried out for specific regions of the subsurface by individually inverting responses from selected stations; Anisotropic 2‐D inversions, using the code of Baba et al [], were carried out using a range of isotropy parameters ( τ iso ) in order to test for the existence of possible anisotropic structures.…”
Section: Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also provide insight into conductors observed within Archean cratons ) and infer plate tectonic processes somewhat similar to those observed today. • One of the seminal results of the Lithoprobe magnetotelluric studies was the first definitive observation of the electrical conductivity structure of the Moho Jones 2013). This observation was enabled by the absence in the Mesoarchean crust of the southeast Slave Craton of any enhancement of conductivity in the middle to lower crust.…”
Section: Results With Global Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in this section, the second aim is to examine how the algorithm behaves if we are inverting for velocity parameters and interface depth simultaneously. Note that an electric Moho is not defined here because it is difficult to resolve in most localities (Jones, ). Our joint inversion approach can be a contributing way to determine the exact electric Moho, but prior to the use it should be primarily established that there is an acceptable expectation of an electric Moho from the MT data.…”
Section: Synthetic Examples and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%