2022
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences12100389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging Arctic Permafrost: Modeling for Choice of Geophysical Methods

Abstract: Knowledge of permafrost structure, with accumulations of free natural gas and gas hydrates, is indispensable for coping with spontaneous gas emission and other problems related to exploration and production drilling in Arctic petroleum provinces. The existing geophysical methods have different potentialities for imaging the permafrost base and geometry, vertical fluid conduits (permeable zones), taliks, gas pockets, and gas hydrate accumulations in the continental Arctic areas. The synthesis of data on cryolog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Walker [44] extensively covers practical ground-based TDEM data collected in Alaska with a loop system. From apparent resistivity responses measured mainly within 10 −4 to 10 −2 s time intervals, by making use of a 1D inversion code, resistivity models have been obtained, showing a resistive permafrost layer with a thickness ranging up to 600 m. A synthetic study [45] also simulating an onshore permafrost setting, found the ability of TDEM response to image lateral inhomogeneities both in permafrost geometry and resistivity of the conductive sediments beneath IBP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walker [44] extensively covers practical ground-based TDEM data collected in Alaska with a loop system. From apparent resistivity responses measured mainly within 10 −4 to 10 −2 s time intervals, by making use of a 1D inversion code, resistivity models have been obtained, showing a resistive permafrost layer with a thickness ranging up to 600 m. A synthetic study [45] also simulating an onshore permafrost setting, found the ability of TDEM response to image lateral inhomogeneities both in permafrost geometry and resistivity of the conductive sediments beneath IBP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ERT has been used to map the extent of permafrost bodies (Buddo et al., 2022; McClymont et al., 2013), it is also known that these estimates have a high uncertainty (Arboleda‐Zapata et al., 2022). We assess the uncertainty of the unsupervised and supervised classification methods through forward modeling of a range of model scenarios.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three contributions [11][12][13] report geophysical evidence of the permafrost structure and gas hydrate deposits. Geophysical surveys can image permafrost to its base, with vertical permeable zones, taliks, gas pockets, and accumulations of gas hydrates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical surveys can image permafrost to its base, with vertical permeable zones, taliks, gas pockets, and accumulations of gas hydrates. The authors of [11] sketch the history of the permafrost in northern West Siberia and suggest its geological model to a depth of 500 m as a possible basis for further modeling. The geophysical surveys applicable to resolve permafrost features include synthetic seismograms, electric resistivity tomography (ERT), and transient electromagnetic (TEM) soundings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%