2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2014.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging Evaluation of Maternal Complications Associated with Repeat Cesarean Deliveries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, uterine rupture is rare, occurring in 1 in 5700 to 20,000 pregnancies . Usually occurring in the setting of trauma or dehiscence of a cesarean section scar, uterine rupture carries a high mortality for both the patient and fetus . US is considered the primary imaging modality.…”
Section: Indications For Mri In Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fortunately, uterine rupture is rare, occurring in 1 in 5700 to 20,000 pregnancies . Usually occurring in the setting of trauma or dehiscence of a cesarean section scar, uterine rupture carries a high mortality for both the patient and fetus . US is considered the primary imaging modality.…”
Section: Indications For Mri In Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51,52 Usually occurring in the setting of trauma or dehiscence of a cesarean section scar, uterine rupture carries a high mortality for both the patient and fetus. 53,54 US is considered the primary imaging modality. However, MRI can offer improved visualization of the uterine wall in equivocal US cases where the patient is clinically stable.…”
Section: Indications For Mri In Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) . In cases of partial dehiscence, it is essential to measure the minimum wall thickness at the site of the dehiscence, as patients with a minimum wall thickness of <2.5 mm require surgical repair …”
Section: Acute Gynecologic Conditions Related To Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, scar defect was not studied by appropriate and available methods in non-pregnant women before the following pregnancies. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Second, the outcomes of peritoneum closure or non-closure are associated with postsurgical made on the impact of the diff erent techniques on these outcomes. Our view is different.…”
Section: The Coronis Trial On Caesarean Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our opinion, there are still some unresolved issues concerning caesarean section technique behind the CORONIS trial. That is why laparoscopy, 2 hysteroscopy, 3 hysterosalpingography, 4 ultrasound, 5,6 and modern visualisation technologies 7 should be applied for precise assessment of the scar defect in the lower uterine segment in individuals who have previously undergone caesarean section.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%