2008
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/10/2/025024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging of carrier-envelope phase effects in above-threshold ionization with intense few-cycle laser fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
76
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
7
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, a couple of theoretical calculations have shown that the parts of PES related to electron recollisions are more sensitive to CEP than those parts related to electrons emitted directly [5,9,[19][20][21]. Experimentally, the dependence of high-energy PES on the CEP has been explored for atoms, e.g., xenon [16,22], argon [23], krypton [22], as well as for small-sized dimer molecules, e.g., N 2 and O 2 [24]. Recently, it has been studied in solids, such as tungsten [25] and gold nanotips [26] which were found to be efficient and controllable nanoemitters of extreme ultraviolet (XUV) electrons, thus allowing to investigate ultrafast electron dynamics in solids at an attosecond time scale, for a recent review see Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, a couple of theoretical calculations have shown that the parts of PES related to electron recollisions are more sensitive to CEP than those parts related to electrons emitted directly [5,9,[19][20][21]. Experimentally, the dependence of high-energy PES on the CEP has been explored for atoms, e.g., xenon [16,22], argon [23], krypton [22], as well as for small-sized dimer molecules, e.g., N 2 and O 2 [24]. Recently, it has been studied in solids, such as tungsten [25] and gold nanotips [26] which were found to be efficient and controllable nanoemitters of extreme ultraviolet (XUV) electrons, thus allowing to investigate ultrafast electron dynamics in solids at an attosecond time scale, for a recent review see Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference between a few-cycle pulse and a multicycle one is the strong dependence of the laser electric field on the so-called Carrier Envelope Phase (CEP) [12,13]. The electric field in a few-cycle pulse can be characterized by its duration and by the CEP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically in such methods, CEP values are estimated by measuring the CEP dependence of highly nonlinear signal and comparing the results with numerical simulations. For example, plasmonic sensors 40,41 , stereo-ATI (above-threshold-ionisation) [42][43][44][45] , velocity map imaging [46][47][48][49] and high harmonic generation 50,51 have been used for such purposes. With the help of a polarization gating technique, the CEP of multi-cycle pulses can be obtained 52 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%