1990
DOI: 10.1063/1.103122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging of ferroelectric domain walls by force microscopy

Abstract: We have imaged ferroelectric domain walls in the ferroelectric-ferroelastic material Gd2(Mo)3 using force microscopy. By using a mode of imaging developed for the detection of static surface charge, the force gradient due to the polarization charge at the sample surface was imaged. The signal was seen to change sign at the domain wall, consistent with the reversal in sign of the polarization across a wall. By modeling the wall as a step function in the electric potential, the general features of the force micr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting features were then imaged by exploiting the piezoelectric response of the material. 14 Writing times in the range from 250 ns to 3 s were investigated for writing voltages between 6 and 12 V, after a uniformly polarized background was obtained by repeated scanning of the 10 mϫ10 m designated test area at Ϫ10 V.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting features were then imaged by exploiting the piezoelectric response of the material. 14 Writing times in the range from 250 ns to 3 s were investigated for writing voltages between 6 and 12 V, after a uniformly polarized background was obtained by repeated scanning of the 10 mϫ10 m designated test area at Ϫ10 V.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of the scanning probe microscopes made available techniques for sensing charges, dielectric constants, film thickness of insulating layers, photo-voltage and electric potentials (Nonnenmacher et al 1991) and ferroelectric domain imaging (Saurenbach and Terris 1990). For instance, the electrostatic force microscope (EFM) maps the spatial variation and potential energy difference between a tip and a sample, arising from non-uniform charge distributions and local variations in surface work function (Nyffenegger et al 1997).…”
Section: Scanning Electric Probe Microscopiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we describe the use of EFM and KPFM for the determination of surface potentials, band bending, and surface state densities and how these parameters relate to device design. While detailed descriptions of EFM [52,53] and KPFM [54] can be found elsewhere, including this book, here we provide a brief background to facilitate useful discussion.…”
Section: Characterization Of Surface Electronic Properties By Spmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The force gradient technique employs a lift height approach, in which the cantilever first measures topography, and then retraces the same line at a certain lift height to measure only the electrostatic interaction, which manifests itself as a shift in the resonant frequency of the tip. The voltage modulation approach developed by Terris et al [52] and Saurenbach et al [53] uses both modulations (mechanically (2) driven cantilever and voltage modulation applied to the tip), allowing topographic and electrostatic images to be acquired simultaneously.…”
Section: Characterization Of Surface Electronic Properties By Spmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation