In a recent report, Oshinski et al 1 concluded that "accurate determination of infarct size by delayed enhancement MRI requires imaging at specific times after gadoliniumdiethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) injection." This conclusion was based on the observation that the size of hyperenhanced regions changed in images acquired at different times after contrast administration. This conclusion, if accurate, would have important implications for the practical use of this technique in the clinical arena.The changes in size of the hyperenhanced regions observed by Oshinski et al, 1 however, were likely caused by an incorrect implementation of the MRI technique. As we have described previously, the MRI technique requires that the correct inversion time be chosen in order to "null" normal myocardium. If the inversion time is too short, the periphery of the hyperenhanced region will pass through a zero-crossing, thereby affecting its apparent size (see Figure 2 of Simonetti et al
ResponseWe appreciate the interest of Drs Judd and Kim in our MRI study showing that soon after myocardial infarction (MI), the size of the delayed enhancement zone decreases as a function of time after the injection of a contrast agent. 1 We found that 2 days after MI, there exists an area at the periphery of the infarct that has a highly transient T1 value. Within the first 5 to 10 minutes after gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) injection, the T1 of this region was similar to infarct, but 20 minutes after contrast injection, its T1 value was similar to normal myocardium. Several studies have now shown that this peripheral area corresponds to reversibly-injured myocardium. 2,3,4 We certainly acknowledge that adjusting the inversion time can improve both image contrast and infarct detection sensitivity. The inversion time adjustments recommended by Drs Judd and Kim explain how it may be possible to underestimate infarct size if the inversion time is not set to null normal myocardium, but it does not explain how it might be possible to overestimate infarct size. Changing MRI parameters does not change the fact that this peripheral area has different washout kinetics than either normal or infarcted myocardium, and thus represents a different pathophysiological state. Recent work in acute MI confirms that as much as half of the enhancement area washes out between 4 and 20 minutes after contrast injection. Furthermore, myocardial segments with contrast washout after 20 minutes demonstrate greater functional recovery than those with persistent enhancement. 4 As noted by Drs Judd and Kim, the selection of inversion time to null normal myocardium after contrast injection is an important variable when using delayed enhancement to define the extent of MI. Currently, there is no reported standardized method to determine the "correct" inversion time for nulling normal myocardium after contrast injection. The required inversion time can vary widely between patients depending on cardiac output, renal function, and the condi...