2000
DOI: 10.1364/ao.39.003232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging with four spherical mirrors

Abstract: We investigate unobstructed, plane-symmetric imaging systems of four spherical mirrors. Fifteen parameters are necessary to specify the configuration of such a system. Constraints are determined that ensure that any resultant system possesses a given set of first-order properties. These constraints remove four parameters as available degrees of freedom. To illustrate the efficacy of this design approach, we present two example studies: one for a class of systems with the object at infinity and another for fini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the first routines to be demonstrated with SLIDERS were based on papers about one and two spherical mirror systems [5,6]. Studies of three and four spherical mirror systems followed [7,8], and these works were then added. Each of these spherical mirror systems assumes only plane symmetry, and all are based on the Hamiltonian methods as developed by Stone and Forbes [9,10].…”
Section: Systems In Slidersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of the first routines to be demonstrated with SLIDERS were based on papers about one and two spherical mirror systems [5,6]. Studies of three and four spherical mirror systems followed [7,8], and these works were then added. Each of these spherical mirror systems assumes only plane symmetry, and all are based on the Hamiltonian methods as developed by Stone and Forbes [9,10].…”
Section: Systems In Slidersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these spherical mirror systems assumes only plane symmetry, and all are based on the Hamiltonian methods as developed by Stone and Forbes [9,10]. References [5][6][7][8] all discuss systems at finite conjugates, and those with the object at infinity. Two and three mirror afocal systems are considered in [11], and multi-reflection systems are discussed in [12].…”
Section: Systems In Slidersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems were chosen for comparison purposes for similar studies on spherical mirror systems presented in Refs. [6][7]. Four representative systems are illustrated in Figure 3, and their construction parameters listed in Table 1 .…”
Section: Example 1: Object At Infinitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] and [7]. Five representative systems are also illustrated in Figure 3, and their construction parameters listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Example 2: Finite Conjugatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the next decade, several applications applying these methods to the design of unobstructed reflective systems have been reported. The studies have included systems with two conic mirrors [3], and spherical mirror systems with two, three and four mirrors [4][5][6][7]. More recently in 2002, nonanamorphic systems composed of three conic mirrors were reported [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%