2010
DOI: 10.1163/9789042032002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imagology Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…El estudio de las percepciones e imágenes transnacionales expresadas en el discurso literario, la imagología, sigue siendo un campo de estudio necesario para resolver malentendidos en la interpretación de los artefactos culturales y para situar correctamente nuestra perspectiva en la compresión histórica del otro (Beller y Leerssen, 2007;Zacharasiewicz, 2010).…”
Section: Polonia En El Mapa De Europaunclassified
“…El estudio de las percepciones e imágenes transnacionales expresadas en el discurso literario, la imagología, sigue siendo un campo de estudio necesario para resolver malentendidos en la interpretación de los artefactos culturales y para situar correctamente nuestra perspectiva en la compresión histórica del otro (Beller y Leerssen, 2007;Zacharasiewicz, 2010).…”
Section: Polonia En El Mapa De Europaunclassified
“…This paper, therefore, suggests complementing discourse analysis with imagolocial approaches from the field of literary criticism. Literary imagology as pioneered by Hugo Dyserinck, Manfred S. Fischer, Waldemar Zacharasiewicz, and others, has moved well beyond the descriptive reconstruction of how members of one culture perceived other countries, regions and peoples (Beller, Agazzi, & Calzoni, 2006;Dukić, 2012;Fischer, 1981;Zacharasiewicz 2010). Rather, they are systematically asking for the notions of the self not only written into but also constructed by the very representation of other countries, regions and peoples.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the mid‐eighteenth century, this body of prejudices hardened into a master opposition that has also dominated European thought ever since: the idea that the south of Europe, with its Romance languages, represents a continuation of a Roman‐imperial tradition (as evinced by the perceived preponderance of Catholicism and an alleged tendency to monarchical government), whereas the north with its Germanic languages represents a continuation of tribal‐democratic polities (as evinced by the perceived preponderance of Protestantism and an alleged tendency to parliamentary or republican government). This myth (for such it is) derives from humanist authors, and by way of Montesquieu's L'Esprit des Lois (where it was aligned with the climatological‐temperamental differences between a cool/cerebral north and a warm/sensual south) has been almost all‐pervasive in European mentalities and discourse (Shackleton ; Zacharasiewicz , ).…”
Section: National Characters Ethnotypes and The Imputation Of Ethnicmentioning
confidence: 99%