1987
DOI: 10.1029/ja092ia02p01193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IMF By and day‐night conductivity effects in the expanding polar cap convection model

Abstract: During southward B z periods the open field line region in the ionosphere (polar cap) expands due to increased dayside merging. Ionospheric plasma flow patterns result which can be classified by the sign of the interplanetary m•ignetic field (IMF) By component. In this paper we construct a time-dependent ionospheric convection model to simulate these flows. The model consists of a spiral boundary with a gap in it. The sign of the IMF By component determines the geometry of the gap. A potential is applied acros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is interesting to note, despite the limited backscatter available, the remarkable consistency of the flow patterns presented with the inferences regarding the motion of newly-reconnected field line footprints based upon lineof-sight data alone and the theoretical predictions of expected flow patterns based upon IMF conditions (Cowley and Lockwood, 1992). The estimated pre-noon location of the throat of the convection pattern in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres is, at least in part, a consequence of the Ruohoniemi and Greenwald (1996) Moses et al (1987) presented a time dependent model of ionospheric flow patterns that incorporated a realistic day-night ionospheric conductivity gradient. Once this conductivity variation was taken into account, mirror symmetry between positive and negative IMF B Y convection patterns was destroyed, and the model reproduced the main features of ion flow observations made by spacecraft over the polar cap (e.g.…”
Section: Superdarn Radar Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is interesting to note, despite the limited backscatter available, the remarkable consistency of the flow patterns presented with the inferences regarding the motion of newly-reconnected field line footprints based upon lineof-sight data alone and the theoretical predictions of expected flow patterns based upon IMF conditions (Cowley and Lockwood, 1992). The estimated pre-noon location of the throat of the convection pattern in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres is, at least in part, a consequence of the Ruohoniemi and Greenwald (1996) Moses et al (1987) presented a time dependent model of ionospheric flow patterns that incorporated a realistic day-night ionospheric conductivity gradient. Once this conductivity variation was taken into account, mirror symmetry between positive and negative IMF B Y convection patterns was destroyed, and the model reproduced the main features of ion flow observations made by spacecraft over the polar cap (e.g.…”
Section: Superdarn Radar Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continual addition and removal of flux across this boundary, as a result of reconnection, is described in the expanding/contracting polar cap model (Siscoe and Huang, 1985;Cowley and Lockwood, 1992). The reconnection location (termed the X-line) on the magnetopause maps to a region in the dayside ionosphere termed the merging gap (Moses et al, 1987) which is a longitudinally-limited region of the PCB through which the ionospheric plasma flows into the polar cap. Identifying the PCB in the dayside ionosphere is crucial for studying the ionospheric signature of magnetic reconnection on the dayside magnetopause.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cowley and Lockwood (1992) discuss the general concepts concerning the excitation of ionospheric convection and consider how patches of newly opened ux and their associated¯ows evolve with time following a burst of magnetopause reconnection. Their model envisages reconnection commencing at the ionospheric footprint of the magnetopause reconnection x-line (sometimes known as the merging gap, Moses et al, 1987) near magnetic local noon and spreading tailward. Observations suggest that the speed of this tailward expansion is between 1 and 10 kms À1 depending on the magnetic local time of observation (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%