2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2015.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate effects of thoracic spinal mobilisation on erector spinae muscle activity and pain in patients with thoracic spine pain: a preliminary randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pairs of surface EMG electrodes were attached to the skin no more than 20mm apart (centre to centre) over the lead (left side for right handed golfers) and trail sides (right side for right handed golfers) of the ES muscle, lateral to longissimus at T8 and L1 levels, and on the multifidus at the L5 level of the spinous process. Specifically, electrodes were placed 30 mm lateral to the spinous process of the eighth thoracic vertebrae (T8) (Cheung et al, 2005;Pecos-Martín et al, 2016) and 30 mm lateral to the first lumbar vertebrae (L1) (Caldwell et al, 2003;Hermens et al, 1999). For the lower lumber region of the ES muscle, electrodes were placed on and aligned with a line from caudal tip posterior spina iliaca superior to the interspace between L1 and the second lumbar vertebrae (L2) interspace at the level of the fifth lumbar vertebrae (L5) (Grimshaw & Burden, 2000;Hermens et al, 1999).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pairs of surface EMG electrodes were attached to the skin no more than 20mm apart (centre to centre) over the lead (left side for right handed golfers) and trail sides (right side for right handed golfers) of the ES muscle, lateral to longissimus at T8 and L1 levels, and on the multifidus at the L5 level of the spinous process. Specifically, electrodes were placed 30 mm lateral to the spinous process of the eighth thoracic vertebrae (T8) (Cheung et al, 2005;Pecos-Martín et al, 2016) and 30 mm lateral to the first lumbar vertebrae (L1) (Caldwell et al, 2003;Hermens et al, 1999). For the lower lumber region of the ES muscle, electrodes were placed on and aligned with a line from caudal tip posterior spina iliaca superior to the interspace between L1 and the second lumbar vertebrae (L2) interspace at the level of the fifth lumbar vertebrae (L5) (Grimshaw & Burden, 2000;Hermens et al, 1999).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physiotherapy treatment using mobilization accounts as half of them. The works of Kamel et al (2016) and Pecos-Martina et al (2017) used posterioranterior (PA) mobilization, the former in lumbar spine and latter the thoracic spine, in both cases a decrease in local pain and muscle activity were observed. Also, in the spine, the study from Hu et al (2014) showed significant differences in sEMG topography after mobilization, between the chronic LBP and healthy subjects.…”
Section: Verify the Efficacy/effectiveness Of The Mt Intervention In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 17 , 18 ] Surface electromyography also uses a special device. [ 16 , 19 ] Accordingly, an easy method of assessing skeletal muscle mass is lacking for clinicians. Therefore, we conducted a study to develop a new easy method of assessing erector spinae muscles for physical activity, such as measuring the thickness of the erector spinae muscles (ESM T ) with CT scans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%